StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Cloud Hosting
  5. Amazon EC2 vs Google App Engine

Amazon EC2 vs Google App Engine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Stacks48.6K
Followers36.0K
Votes2.5K
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611

Amazon EC2 vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon EC2 and Google App Engine are both popular cloud computing platforms that offer infrastructure services to deploy and manage applications. However, there are key differences between the two platforms that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Pricing and Flexibility: Amazon EC2 provides more pricing options and flexibility. It allows users to choose and pay for resources on an hourly basis, offering more control and scalability for businesses with fluctuating workloads. On the other hand, Google App Engine operates on an automatic scaling model based on usage and offers limited pricing options, making it more suitable for applications with consistent workloads.

  2. Managed vs. Unmanaged: Google App Engine is a fully managed platform, meaning that Google handles most of the underlying infrastructure tasks, such as patching, scaling, and monitoring. This makes it easier for developers to focus on writing code and reduces the operational burden. In contrast, Amazon EC2 provides more control and requires users to manage their virtual machines, including patching, scaling, and monitoring. This flexibility allows for more customization but also requires more system administration tasks.

  3. Environment Support: Amazon EC2 supports a wide range of operating systems and unlimited programming languages, providing a more versatile environment for developers. It allows users to choose the desired operating system and customize the software stack as per their needs. On the other hand, Google App Engine supports specific programming languages like Python, Java, PHP, and Go, limiting the choice for developers who prefer other programming languages or frameworks.

  4. Scalability and Auto-scaling: Amazon EC2 provides manual vertical and horizontal scaling options, allowing users to scale their resources up or down based on demand. It also offers auto-scaling features that adjust resources automatically based on predefined rules or metrics. In contrast, Google App Engine offers automatic horizontal scaling, monitoring application's traffic and adjusting resources accordingly. This makes it easier to handle sudden spikes in traffic without manual intervention.

  5. Storage Options: Amazon EC2 offers various storage options, including Elastic Block Store (EBS), Amazon S3, and Amazon Glacier. This provides flexibility in choosing the appropriate storage solution for different use cases, from high-performance databases to long-term archival storage. On the other hand, Google App Engine primarily uses Google Cloud Storage for persistent storage, which is a scalable and highly available object storage service.

  6. Networking and Security: Amazon EC2 provides more networking and security features, allowing users to configure virtual private clouds (VPCs) and define network access control rules. It also provides options for setting up VPN connections and dedicated network connections. Google App Engine, on the other hand, offers a simpler networking model and relies on Google Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control and security.

In summary, Amazon EC2 offers more pricing options, flexibility, and control over the infrastructure, while Google App Engine provides a fully managed environment, automatic scaling, and easier deployment experience. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific needs of the application and the level of control and customization required.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2, Google App Engine

Craig
Craig

Principal Consultant at Rootwork InfoTech LLC

Jul 16, 2020

Decided

We first selected Google Cloud Platform about five years ago, because HIPAA compliance was significantly cheaper and easier on Google compared to AWS. We have stayed with Google Cloud because it provides an excellent command line tool for managing resources, and every resource has a well-designed, well-documented API. SDKs for most of these APIs are available for many popular languages. I have never worked with a cloud platform that's so amenable to automation. Google is also ahead of its competitors in Kubernetes support.

200k views200k
Comments
Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Needs advice

DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.

However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.

One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.

Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.

264k views264k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Most bioinformatics shops nowadays are hosting on AWS or Azure, since they have HIPAA tiers and offer enterprise SLA contracts. Meanwhile Heroku hasn't historically supported HIPAA. Rackspace and Google Cloud would be other hosting providers we would consider, but we just don't get requests for them. So, we mostly focus on AWS and Azure support.

156k views156k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Google App Engine
Google App Engine

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Elastic – Amazon EC2 enables you to increase or decrease capacity within minutes, not hours or days. You can commission one, hundreds or even thousands of server instances simultaneously.;Completely Controlled – You have complete control of your instances. You have root access to each one, and you can interact with them as you would any machine.;Flexible – You have the choice of multiple instance types, operating systems, and software packages. Amazon EC2 allows you to select a configuration of memory, CPU, instance storage, and the boot partition size that is optimal for your choice of operating system and application.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services – Amazon EC2 works in conjunction with Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), Amazon SimpleDB and Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to provide a complete solution for computing, query processing and storage across a wide range of applications.;Reliable – Amazon EC2 offers a highly reliable environment where replacement instances can be rapidly and predictably commissioned. The Amazon EC2 Service Level Agreement commitment is 99.95% availability for each Amazon EC2 Region.;Secure – Amazon EC2 works in conjunction with Amazon VPC to provide security and robust networking functionality for your compute resources.;Inexpensive – Amazon EC2 passes on to you the financial benefits of Amazon’s scale. You pay a very low rate for the compute capacity you actually consume.;Easy to Start – Quickly get started with Amazon EC2 by visiting AWS Marketplace to choose preconfigured software on Amazon Machine Images (AMIs). You can quickly deploy this software to EC2 via 1-Click launch or with the EC2 console.
Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
Statistics
Stacks
48.6K
Stacks
10.5K
Followers
36.0K
Followers
8.1K
Votes
2.5K
Votes
611
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 647
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 515
    Scalability
  • 393
    Easy management
  • 277
    Low cost
  • 271
    Auto-scaling
Cons
  • 14
    Ui could use a lot of work
  • 6
    High learning curve when compared to PaaS
  • 3
    Extremely poor CPU performance
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Integrations
No integrations available
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2, Google App Engine?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Scaleway

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase