StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Amazon EMR vs Google BigQuery vs Snowflake

Amazon EMR vs Google BigQuery vs Snowflake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EMR
Amazon EMR
Stacks542
Followers682
Votes54
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes152
Snowflake
Snowflake
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes27

Amazon EMR vs Google BigQuery vs Snowflake: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Amazon EMR, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake

Amazon EMR, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake are widely used cloud-based big data processing and warehousing services. Below are some key differences between Amazon EMR, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake.

1. **Data Processing Approach**: Amazon EMR is an elastic big data processing service that allows users to run frameworks like Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark on Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud. Google BigQuery is a serverless, highly scalable enterprise data warehouse that enables users to run SQL queries against large datasets in real-time. Snowflake, on the other hand, is a cloud-based data warehousing platform that works on a unique architecture that separates storage and compute, providing more flexibility and scalability.

2. **Pricing Model**: Amazon EMR pricing is based on the EC2 instances and S3 storage used during processing, while Google BigQuery operates on a pay-as-you-go model based on the amount of data processed. Snowflake offers a consumption-based pricing model where users only pay for the storage and compute resources they use, providing a more cost-effective solution for organizations with fluctuating workloads.

3. **Ease of Use**: Amazon EMR requires users to manage and configure the underlying infrastructure, making it suitable for users with expertise in big data technologies. Google BigQuery, being a serverless solution, eliminates the need for managing infrastructure, making it more accessible to users with SQL querying skills. Snowflake simplifies data warehousing by handling all infrastructure management and optimization tasks, allowing users to focus on analyzing data rather than managing servers.

4. **Performance and Scalability**: Amazon EMR offers high performance for processing large-scale data with the flexibility to scale resources based on demand. Google BigQuery provides fast query performance for large datasets by distributing queries across multiple servers and automatically optimizing query execution. Snowflake's unique architecture enables it to scale both storage and compute resources dynamically, ensuring consistent performance for varying workloads.

5. **Security Features**: Amazon EMR provides encryption options for data at rest and in transit, access controls, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for secure data processing. Google BigQuery offers fine-grained access controls, data encryption, audit logging, and integration with Google Cloud IAM for secure data management. Snowflake provides robust security features such as end-to-end encryption, granular access controls, and multi-factor authentication, making it suitable for enterprises with strict security requirements.

In Summary, Amazon EMR, Google BigQuery, and Snowflake differ in their data processing approach, pricing model, ease of use, performance and scalability, and security features, catering to different user needs and preferences in big data processing and data warehousing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EMR
Amazon EMR
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Snowflake
Snowflake

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

Elastic- Amazon EMR enables you to quickly and easily provision as much capacity as you need and add or remove capacity at any time. Deploy multiple clusters or resize a running cluster;Low Cost- Amazon EMR is designed to reduce the cost of processing large amounts of data. Some of the features that make it low cost include low hourly pricing, Amazon EC2 Spot integration, Amazon EC2 Reserved Instance integration, elasticity, and Amazon S3 integration.;Flexible Data Stores- With Amazon EMR, you can leverage multiple data stores, including Amazon S3, the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), and Amazon DynamoDB.;Hadoop Tools- EMR supports powerful and proven Hadoop tools such as Hive, Pig, and HBase.
All behind the scenes- Your queries can execute asynchronously in the background, and can be polled for status.;Import data with ease- Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in bursts of up to 1,000 rows per second.;Affordable big data- The first Terabyte of data processed each month is free.;The right interface- Separate interfaces for administration and developers will make sure that you have access to the tools you need.
-
Statistics
Stacks
542
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
682
Followers
1.5K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
54
Votes
152
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    On demand processing power
  • 12
    Don't need to maintain Hadoop Cluster yourself
  • 7
    Hadoop Tools
  • 6
    Elastic
  • 4
    Backed by Amazon
Pros
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
Cons
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data
  • 0
    Sdas
Pros
  • 7
    Public and Private Data Sharing
  • 4
    Good Performance
  • 4
    User Friendly
  • 4
    Multicloud
  • 3
    Great Documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
Xplenty
Xplenty
Fluentd
Fluentd
Looker
Looker
Chartio
Chartio
Treasure Data
Treasure Data
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
Looker
Looker
Periscope
Periscope
Mode
Mode

What are some alternatives to Amazon EMR, Google BigQuery, Snowflake?

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Stitch

Stitch

Stitch is a simple, powerful ETL service built for software developers. Stitch evolved out of RJMetrics, a widely used business intelligence platform. When RJMetrics was acquired by Magento in 2016, Stitch was launched as its own company.

Azure Synapse

Azure Synapse

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Dremio

Dremio

Dremio—the data lake engine, operationalizes your data lake storage and speeds your analytics processes with a high-performance and high-efficiency query engine while also democratizing data access for data scientists and analysts.

Cloudera Enterprise

Cloudera Enterprise

Cloudera Enterprise includes CDH, the world’s most popular open source Hadoop-based platform, as well as advanced system management and data management tools plus dedicated support and community advocacy from our world-class team of Hadoop developers and experts.

Airbyte

Airbyte

It is an open-source data integration platform that syncs data from applications, APIs & databases to data warehouses lakes & DBs.

Treasure Data

Treasure Data

Treasure Data's Big Data as-a-Service cloud platform enables data-driven businesses to focus their precious development resources on their applications, not on mundane, time-consuming integration and operational tasks. The Treasure Data Cloud Data Warehouse service offers an affordable, quick-to-implement and easy-to-use big data option that does not require specialized IT resources, making big data analytics available to the mass market.

Xplenty

Xplenty

Read and process data from cloud storage sources such as Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files and IBM SoftLayer Object Storage. Once done processing, Xplenty allows you to connect with Amazon Redshift, SAP HANA and Google BigQuery. You can also store processed data back in your favorite relational database, cloud storage or key-value store.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase