Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon MQ vs Azure Service Bus: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus
In this article, we will explore the key differences between Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus. Both Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus are managed messaging services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft, respectively. These services help businesses decouple their applications, improve reliability, and increase scalability by providing a messaging infrastructure. However, there are several differences between them.
Protocol Support: Amazon MQ supports different messaging protocols, including Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), OpenWire, and Message Queue Telemetry Transport (MQTT). On the other hand, Azure Service Bus primarily supports the AMQP and HTTP protocols. This difference in protocol support gives customers flexibility in choosing the protocol that best suits their needs.
Deployment Model: Amazon MQ is a fully managed service that runs on Amazon's infrastructure. It can be easily provisioned and managed using the AWS Management Console. In contrast, Azure Service Bus can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid model, giving customers more deployment flexibility.
Message Ordering: Amazon MQ provides strict ordering of messages within the same message group, ensuring that messages are processed in the exact order they are received. Azure Service Bus, on the other hand, does not guarantee strict ordering of messages within a queue or topic, making it suitable for scenarios where strict ordering is not a requirement.
Feature Set: Amazon MQ offers a broader range of features compared to Azure Service Bus. For example, Amazon MQ supports broker-to-broker connectivity with Amazon ActiveMQ and RabbitMQ, while Azure Service Bus does not have this capability. Additionally, Amazon MQ provides more extensive monitoring and management features, such as performance metrics and alarms.
Pricing Model: The pricing models for Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus differ. Amazon MQ pricing is based on the instance type and usage, while Azure Service Bus pricing is based on the number of messaging operations and data transfer. Customers should consider their specific messaging needs and choose the pricing model that aligns with their requirements.
Integration with Other Services: Both Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus can integrate with other services in their respective cloud providers' ecosystems. However, Amazon MQ has tighter integration with other AWS services, such as Amazon SNS, Amazon SQS, and AWS Lambda, which can provide additional capabilities and flexibility for customers.
In Summary, the key differences between Amazon MQ and Azure Service Bus include protocol support, deployment model, message ordering, feature set, pricing model, and integration with other services. These differences allow customers to select the messaging service that best fits their specific requirements and preferences.
Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?
We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).
Thank you very much in advance :)
There are many different messaging frameworks available for IPC use. It's not really a question of how "new" the technology is, but what you need it to do. Azure Service Bus can be a great service to use, but it can also take a lot of effort to administrate and maintain that can make it costly to use unless you need the more advanced features it offers for routing, sequencing, delivery, etc. I would recommend checking out this link to get a basic idea of different messaging architectures. These only cover Azure services, but there are many other solutions that use similar architectural models.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services
I want to schedule a message. Amazon SQS provides a delay of 15 minutes, but I want it in some hours.
Example: Let's say a Message1 is consumed by a consumer A but somehow it failed inside the consumer. I would want to put it in a queue and retry after 4hrs. Can I do this in Amazon MQ? I have seen in some Amazon MQ videos saying scheduling messages can be done. But, I'm not sure how.
Mithiridi, I believe you are talking about two different things. 1. If you need to process messages with delays of more 15m or at specific times, it's not a good idea to use queues, independently of tool SQM, Rabbit or Amazon MQ. you should considerer another approach using a scheduled job. 2. For dead queues and policy retries RabbitMQ, for example, doesn't support your use case. https://medium.com/@kiennguyen88/rabbitmq-delay-retry-schedule-with-dead-letter-exchange-31fb25a440fc I'm not sure if that is possible SNS/SQS support, they have a maximum delay for delivery (maxDelayTarget) in seconds but it's not clear the number. You can check this out: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sns/latest/dg/sns-message-delivery-retries.html
Pros of Amazon MQ
- Supports low IQ developers7
- Supports existing protocols (JMS, NMS, AMQP, STOMP, …)3
- Easy to migrate existing messaging service2
Pros of Azure Service Bus
- Easy Integration with .Net4
- Cloud Native2
- Use while high messaging need1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon MQ
- Slow AF4
Cons of Azure Service Bus
- Limited features in Basic tier1
- Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in1
- Lacking in JMS support1
- Observability of messages in the queue is lacking1
