StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Cloud Task Management
  5. Amazon SWF vs Stream

Amazon SWF vs Stream

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon SWF
Amazon SWF
Stacks35
Followers79
Votes0
Stream
Stream
Stacks290
Followers226
Votes54

Amazon SWF vs Stream: What are the differences?

Developers describe Amazon SWF as "Automate the coordination, auditing, and scaling of applications across multiple machines". Amazon Simple Workflow allows you to structure the various processing steps in an application that runs across one or more machines as a set of “tasks.” Amazon SWF manages dependencies between the tasks, schedules the tasks for execution, and runs any logic that needs to be executed in parallel. The service also stores the tasks, reliably dispatches them to application components, tracks their progress, and keeps their latest state. On the other hand, Stream is detailed as "Build scalable feeds, activity streams & chat in a few hours instead of months". Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages.

Amazon SWF and Stream are primarily classified as "Cloud Task Management" and "Activity Feeds as a Service" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Amazon SWF are:

  • Maintaining application state
  • Tracking workflow executions and logging their progress
  • Holding and dispatching tasks

On the other hand, Stream provides the following key features:

  • Activity, Notification & Personalized Feeds
  • Real-Time Chat
  • Multi-Region Support

StackShare, Product Hunt, and Bunch are some of the popular companies that use Stream, whereas Amazon SWF is used by Amazon, Better, and MaaS Global. Stream has a broader approval, being mentioned in 51 company stacks & 92 developers stacks; compared to Amazon SWF, which is listed in 13 company stacks and 19 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon SWF
Amazon SWF
Stream
Stream

Amazon Simple Workflow allows you to structure the various processing steps in an application that runs across one or more machines as a set of “tasks.” Amazon SWF manages dependencies between the tasks, schedules the tasks for execution, and runs any logic that needs to be executed in parallel. The service also stores the tasks, reliably dispatches them to application components, tracks their progress, and keeps their latest state.

Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages.

Maintaining application state;Tracking workflow executions and logging their progress;Holding and dispatching tasks;Controlling which tasks each of your application hosts will be assigned to execute
Activity, Notification & Personalized Feeds; Real-Time Chat; Multi-Region Support; High Availability; SDKs & Components;
Statistics
Stacks
35
Stacks
290
Followers
79
Followers
226
Votes
0
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 18
    Integrates via easy-to-use REST API
  • 18
    It's easy to setup with the minimum coding
  • 18
    Up and running in few minutes
Integrations
No integrations available
Rails
Rails
Django
Django
PHP
PHP
Java
Java
Scala
Scala
Node.js
Node.js
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang
Python
Python
Parse
Parse

What are some alternatives to Amazon SWF, Stream?

AWS Step Functions

AWS Step Functions

AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.

Google Keep

Google Keep

It is a note-taking service developed by Google. It is available on the web, and has mobile apps for the Android and iOS mobile operating systems. Keep offers a variety of tools for taking notes, including text, lists, images, and audio.

Workfront

Workfront

It allows user to manage projects in one place. It helps marketing, IT, & enterprise teams conquer chaos by improving productivity, collaboration, and visibility.

Blink

Blink

It empowers and protects your most important people with the information and tools they need. Its Direct & Group Messaging means you can reach anyone, anytime, without the need for email addresses or phone numbers.

Taskworld

Taskworld

It is designed to facilitate project and task management, collaboration, delegation, communication, knowledge management, measure progress and provide performance metrics for evidence-based evaluations within teams.

Content Discovery Feed

Content Discovery Feed

Always be up to date with the best articles from your favorite websites. All via a simple RSS connection. Stay up to date about the latest writing trends and get inspired to start creating your own content by reading your daily dose of articles, all in one tab! Add your most read blogs, news sites, forums, ... to your feeds and discover new content each time you open a new tab.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope