StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Amethyst vs pygame

Amethyst vs pygame

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

pygame
pygame
Stacks122
Followers173
Votes5
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Amethyst
Amethyst
Stacks5
Followers20
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks735

Amethyst vs pygame: What are the differences?

  1. Graphics Rendering: One key difference between Amethyst and pygame is their approach to graphics rendering. Amethyst uses a modern graphics engine based on the open-source rendering engine called gfx. This allows for more advanced graphics features and effects compared to pygame, which relies on the SDL library for its rendering capabilities.

  2. Entity Component System (ECS): Amethyst utilizes an Entity Component System (ECS) architecture for structuring game entities and components, providing better organization and scalability of game objects. In contrast, pygame does not have built-in support for ECS, requiring developers to implement their own entity management systems.

  3. Supported Platforms: Amethyst is designed to be cross-platform, allowing for game development on Windows, macOS, Linux, and even web browsers through WebAssembly. On the other hand, pygame is primarily targeted towards desktop platforms, limiting its ability to deploy games on a wider range of devices.

  4. Performance Optimization: Amethyst places a strong emphasis on performance optimization, leveraging features such as parallelism and data-oriented design to maximize efficiency. While pygame is capable of delivering satisfactory performance for simpler games, it may struggle with handling complex computations or large-scale simulations due to its design limitations.

  5. Community and Documentation: The size and activity of the developer community surrounding Amethyst and pygame differ significantly. Amethyst benefits from a growing community that actively contributes to its development, providing resources and support for newcomers. In contrast, pygame has a more established but relatively smaller community, which may result in slower updates and fewer readily available resources.

  6. Learning Curve: The learning curves for Amethyst and pygame can vary for developers with different backgrounds and skill levels. Amethyst's use of modern game development principles and Rust language may present a steeper learning curve for beginners, while pygame's simplicity and ease of use make it more approachable for newcomers to game development with Python.

In Summary, Amethyst and pygame differ in graphics rendering capabilities, ECS architecture, supported platforms, performance optimization, community size, and learning curve, making each suitable for different types of game development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

pygame
pygame
Amethyst
Amethyst

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Uses gfx-rs to render graphics with OpenGL, and soon Vulkan and Metal. It is meant to be used for 2D and 3D, with various utilities for both types of games.

Highly portable; Runs on nearly every platform and operating system
High Performance; Built for 2D and 3D; Uses all CPU cores to run internals and logic
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
735
Stacks
122
Stacks
5
Followers
173
Followers
20
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to install
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
Cons
  • 2
    Has only 2d
  • 1
    Slow
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
JetBrains Rider
JetBrains Rider
Ninject
Ninject
PlayFab
PlayFab
TestFairy
TestFairy
Vuforia
Vuforia
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to pygame, Amethyst?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase