StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. UI Components
  5. Ant Design vs Ionicons

Ant Design vs Ionicons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ionicons
Ionicons
Stacks1.4K
Followers68
Votes6
GitHub Stars17.9K
Forks2.1K
Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K

Ant Design vs Ionicons: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Ant Design and Ionicons, focusing on specific aspects that differentiate these two popular design systems.

  1. Design Philosophy: Ant Design emphasizes a clean, elegant, and professional design language that is consistent across its components, providing a cohesive user interface. Ionicons, on the other hand, focuses on sleek, minimalistic icons that are versatile and customizable for different design contexts.

  2. Component Library: Ant Design offers a comprehensive library of UI components, including layouts, forms, navigation, and data display elements, tailored for building enterprise-level applications. Ionicons, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing a wide range of icon sets for various use cases, such as app development, websites, and interfaces.

  3. Customization Options: Ant Design provides extensive theming capabilities, allowing developers to customize the look and feel of their applications easily. Ionicons offer limited customization options since they primarily focus on providing pre-designed icons to enhance visual elements.

  4. Community Support: Ant Design has a large and active community of developers, designers, and contributors who regularly update and maintain the library, providing support through documentation, forums, and GitHub repositories. Ionicons also have a supportive community but may not be as extensive or diverse as Ant Design's community.

  5. Technology Stack Compatibility: Ant Design is closely integrated with React.js, making it an ideal choice for developers utilizing this JavaScript library for building web applications. Ionicons, on the other hand, can be used with various frameworks and technologies beyond React, offering flexibility in integration.

  6. Focus on Scalability: Ant Design is well-suited for scalable projects and large teams working on complex applications due to its robust component architecture and design system. Ionicons, while versatile, may be more suitable for smaller projects or applications that require specific iconography needs rather than a comprehensive design system.

In Summary, Ant Design and Ionicons cater to different design needs, with Ant Design focusing on comprehensive UI component libraries and design systems for enterprise applications, while Ionicons primarily provide customizable icon sets for various design contexts.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ionicons
Ionicons
Ant Design
Ant Design

Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed.

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Open-source icon set with 700+ icons ; Crafted for web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps; Have both Material Design and iOS versions
Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.9K
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
53.9K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
68
Followers
1.7K
Votes
6
Votes
224
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Ui Components
  • 2
    Icons
  • 1
    Looks Amazing
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Integrations
Ionic
Ionic
iOS
iOS
Android OS
Android OS
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap

What are some alternatives to Ionicons, Ant Design?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase