StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Hive vs Vertica

Apache Hive vs Vertica

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vertica
Vertica
Stacks88
Followers120
Votes16
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Stacks487
Followers475
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks4.8K

Apache Hive vs Vertica: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Hive and Vertica are both popular Big Data processing tools used for analyzing and querying large datasets. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Data storage architecture: Apache Hive is based on the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and stores data in Hadoop's distributed file system. In contrast, Vertica uses a columnar storage architecture, which organizes data by column rather than by row. This allows for faster query processing and better compression rates in Vertica.

  2. Data processing speed: Vertica is designed for high-performance analytics and can handle large volumes of data with high processing speeds. It leverages the massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture to execute queries in parallel across multiple nodes. In comparison, Hive's query performance is slower due to its reliance on MapReduce for data processing, which introduces additional overhead.

  3. Query language support: Hive uses Hive Query Language (HQL), which is similar to SQL but has some limitations and lacks advanced querying capabilities. On the other hand, Vertica supports a full-fledged SQL query language with advanced analytics functions, making it easier for SQL-savvy developers to work with.

  4. Indexing and optimization: Vertica has built-in indexing capabilities, allowing for efficient data retrieval and improved query performance. It also provides query optimization features, such as query rewrite and query tuning, to enhance performance further. Hive, however, lacks robust indexing and optimization techniques, which can affect query execution times, especially for complex queries.

  5. Data compression and storage efficiency: Vertica's columnar storage architecture enables better data compression, resulting in reduced storage requirements for large datasets. It also supports compression algorithms like Run-Length Encoding (RLE) and Dictionary Encoding, which further optimize storage efficiency. Hive, in contrast, does not offer the same level of storage efficiency and compression as Vertica.

  6. Scalability and flexibility: Vertica is known for its scalability and ability to handle massive datasets. It can scale horizontally by adding more nodes, allowing for seamless expansion as data volumes grow. Hive, although designed for handling big data, may face scalability challenges due to its reliance on Hadoop's underlying infrastructure. Additionally, Vertica offers flexible data loading options, such as real-time data ingestion, which Hive may lack.

In summary, Apache Hive and Vertica differ in their data storage architecture, query performance, query language support, indexing and optimization capabilities, data compression and storage efficiency, as well as scalability and flexibility. These factors contribute to Vertica's superiority in terms of speed, advanced querying, storage optimization, and scalability compared to Hive.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vertica, Apache Hive

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vertica
Vertica
Apache Hive
Apache Hive

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

Hive facilitates reading, writing, and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage using SQL. Structure can be projected onto data already in storage.

Analyze All of Your Data. No longer move data or settle for siloed views;Achieve Scale and Performance;Fear of growing data volumes and users is a thing of the past;Future-Proof Your Analytics
Built on top of Apache Hadoop; Tools to enable easy access to data via SQL; Support for extract/transform/load (ETL), reporting, and data analysis; Access to files stored either directly in Apache HDFS and HBase; Query execution using Apache Hadoop MapReduce, Tez or Spark frameworks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
88
Stacks
487
Followers
120
Followers
475
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Shared nothing or shared everything architecture
  • 1
    Partition pruning and predicate push down on Parquet
  • 1
    Vertica is the only product which offers partition prun
  • 1
    Query-Optimized Storage
  • 1
    Fully automated Database Designer tool
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Oracle
Oracle
Golang
Golang
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Sass
Sass
Mode
Mode
PowerBI
PowerBI
Tableau
Tableau
Talend
Talend
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
HBase
HBase

What are some alternatives to Vertica, Apache Hive?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase