StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. API Blueprint vs Chakram

API Blueprint vs Chakram

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

API Blueprint
API Blueprint
Stacks99
Followers99
Votes2
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.1K
Chakram
Chakram
Stacks7
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars904
Forks93

API Blueprint vs Chakram: What are the differences?

Introduction

API Blueprint and Chakram are both tools used for API testing and documentation. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that set them apart in terms of functionality and usability.

  1. Format and Documentation: API Blueprint focuses primarily on API documentation and follows a strict blueprint format, making it easier to generate documentation directly from the API code. On the other hand, Chakram is more oriented towards API testing and offers a more flexible approach to writing tests without strict adherence to a specific format.

  2. Mocking Capabilities: Chakram excels in its ability to mock API endpoints during testing, making it easier to simulate various responses and scenarios. API Blueprint, on the other hand, lacks built-in mocking capabilities and is more focused on generating accurate documentation based on the API code.

  3. Testing Capabilities: Chakram provides a robust testing framework with features such as assertions, hooks, and reporters, making it suitable for complex API testing scenarios. API Blueprint, while it can be used for testing, lacks the advanced testing features found in Chakram, making it more suitable for simple test cases.

  4. Extensibility: Chakram offers more extensibility options through plugins and custom modules, allowing users to enhance and customize their testing capabilities. API Blueprint, while it provides a structured format for documentation, has limited extensibility options for extending its functionality beyond basic documentation generation.

  5. Community Support: Chakram has a more active and growing community of users and contributors, providing a rich ecosystem of resources, plugins, and support. API Blueprint, while widely used, may not have the same level of community support and resources available for users seeking assistance or customization options.

  6. User Interface: Chakram typically offers a more user-friendly interface and tooling, making it easier for testers and developers to write and execute tests efficiently. API Blueprint, being more focused on documentation, may have a less intuitive user interface for testing purposes.

In Summary, API Blueprint and Chakram offer distinct advantages in API documentation and testing, respectively, with differences in formatting, testing capabilities, community support, and extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

API Blueprint
API Blueprint
Chakram
Chakram

API Blueprint is simple and accessible to everybody involved in the API lifecycle. Its syntax is concise yet expressive. With API Blueprint you can quickly design and prototype APIs to be created or document and test already deployed mission-critical APIs.

It is a REST API testing framework offering a BDD testing style and fully exploiting promises. It allows you to write clear and comprehensive tests, ensuring JSON REST endpoints work correctly as you develop and in the future.

-
Status codes; Cookie presence and value; Header presence and value; JSON values; Promise based; Plugin support; Custom assertions; Exports results in a variety of formats; Debugging support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
904
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
93
Stacks
99
Stacks
7
Followers
99
Followers
14
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Ecosystem of tools
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
Mocha
Mocha
Chai
Chai
JSON
JSON

What are some alternatives to API Blueprint, Chakram?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope