StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. API Plug vs Rest.li

API Plug vs Rest.li

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rest.li
Rest.li
Stacks14
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.5K
Forks556
API Plug
API Plug
Stacks1
Followers14
Votes0

API Plug vs Rest.li: What are the differences?

<API Plug and Rest.li are two popular API frameworks with unique features and differences. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between API Plug and Rest.li.>

1. **Protocol Support**: API Plug supports various protocols like HTTP, Websocket, and AMQP, providing flexibility in communication options. In contrast, Rest.li is specifically designed for RESTful APIs, adhering to REST principles such as statelessness and caching.
2. **Ease of Use**: API Plug is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it beginner-friendly and quicker to set up. On the other hand, Rest.li requires a deeper understanding of REST concepts and can be more complex to implement for those unfamiliar with REST architecture.
3. **Scalability**: Rest.li is built for high scalability and performance, with features like request/response batching and optimized data fetching. API Plug, while capable of scaling efficiently, may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as Rest.li.
4. **Client-Generated Errors Handling**: Rest.li provides robust error handling mechanisms for client-generated errors, allowing developers to define specific error codes and messages. API Plug may offer more limited options for custom error handling in such scenarios.
5. **Data Modeling**: Rest.li includes powerful data modeling capabilities, such as schema definitions and validation, making it ideal for working with complex data structures. API Plug may have more straightforward data modeling options but could lack the advanced features provided by Rest.li.
6. **Community Support**: Rest.li, being developed by LinkedIn, benefits from a strong community of users and contributors, offering extensive documentation and resources. API Plug, while supported by its own community, may not have the same level of widespread adoption and resources available.

In Summary, the key differences between API Plug and Rest.li lie in their protocol support, ease of use, scalability, error handling, data modeling capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rest.li
Rest.li
API Plug
API Plug

Rest.li is an open source REST framework for building robust, scalable RESTful architectures using type-safe bindings and asynchronous, non-blocking IO. Rest.li fills a niche for applying RESTful principals at scale with an end-to-end developer workflow for buildings REST APIs that promotes clean REST practices, uniform interface design and consistent data modeling.

You don't need to be a backend developer to use APIPlug. We will help you in every step to generate RESTFUL API codes from your data sources.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
556
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
14
Stacks
1
Followers
39
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Kong
Kong
MySQL
MySQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Rest.li, API Plug?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope