StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Web Scraping API
  5. Apifier vs Puppeteer

Apifier vs Puppeteer

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apify
Apify
Stacks41
Followers78
Votes4
Puppeteer
Puppeteer
Stacks1.0K
Followers582
Votes26

Apifier vs Puppeteer: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Apifier is a platform that provides a higher-level layer of abstraction for web scraping tasks, while Puppeteer gives users more control over low-level interactions with the browser allowing for more customization in scraping tasks.

  2. Automated Tasks: Apifier focuses on automating and scheduling large-scale scraping tasks, while Puppeteer is more suitable for smaller, manual scraping tasks where customization is crucial.

  3. Scalability: Apifier is designed for scalability and can handle large volumes of data processing easily, while Puppeteer is better suited for smaller scale projects due to its focus on fine-tuned customization.

  4. Community and Support: Puppeteer has a larger community and more extensive documentation, making it easier for users to find help and resources, while Apifier has a more specialized user base but offers strong support for its platform.

  5. Cost: Apifier is a paid platform with tiered pricing based on usage and features, while Puppeteer is open-source and free to use, making it more accessible for smaller projects or users on a budget.

  6. Ease of Use: Apifier offers a drag-and-drop interface for building scrapers, making it more user-friendly for beginners, while Puppeteer requires more technical knowledge and coding skills, which may be challenging for novice users.

In Summary, the key differences between Apifier and Puppeteer lie in their architecture, automated task capabilities, scalability, community support, cost, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apify, Puppeteer

Ankur
Ankur

Software Engineer

Dec 4, 2019

Needs advice

I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?

73.1k views73.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apify
Apify
Puppeteer
Puppeteer

Apify is a platform that enables developers to create, customize and run cloud-based programs called actors that can, among other things, be used to extract data from any website using a few lines of JavaScript.

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

Full-featured API; Docker support; Integration via webhooks; Advanced scheduling; Custom solution marketplace
-
Statistics
Stacks
41
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
78
Followers
582
Votes
4
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Perfect for Heavy Java Script Websites
Pros
  • 10
    Scriptable web browser
  • 10
    Very well documented
  • 6
    Promise based
Cons
  • 10
    Chrome only
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Apify, Puppeteer?

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

import.io

import.io

import.io is a free web-based platform that puts the power of the machine readable web in your hands. Using our tools you can create an API or crawl an entire website in a fraction of the time of traditional methods, no coding required.

ParseHub

ParseHub

Web Scraping and Data Extraction ParseHub is a free and powerful web scraping tool. With our advanced web scraper, extracting data is as easy as clicking on the data you need. ParseHub lets you turn any website into a spreadsheet or API w

PhantomJS

PhantomJS

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

ScrapingAnt

ScrapingAnt

Extract data from websites and turn them to API. We will handle all the rotating proxies and Chrome rendering for you. Many specialists have to handle Javascript rendering, headless browser update and maintenance, proxies diversity and rotation. It is a simple API that does all the above for you.

Octoparse

Octoparse

It is a free client-side Windows web scraping software that turns unstructured or semi-structured data from websites into structured data sets, no coding necessary. Extracted data can be exported as API, CSV, Excel or exported into a database.

Kimono

Kimono

You don't need to write any code or install any software to extract data with Kimono. The easiest way to use Kimono is to add our bookmarklet to your browser's bookmark bar. Then go to the website you want to get data from and click the bookmarklet. Select the data you want and Kimono does the rest. We take care of hosting the APIs that you build with Kimono and running them on the schedule you specify. Use the API output in JSON or as CSV files that you can easily paste into a spreadsheet.

BeautifulSoup

BeautifulSoup

It works with your favorite parser to provide idiomatic ways of navigating, searching, and modifying the parse tree. It commonly saves programmers hours or days of work.

HeadlessTesting

HeadlessTesting

Headless Browser Cloud for Developers. Connect your Puppeteer and Playwright scripts to our Cloud. Automated Browser Testing with Puppeteer and Playwright in the Cloud.

jsdom

jsdom

It is a pure-JavaScript implementation of many web standards, notably the WHATWG DOM and HTML Standards, for use with Node.js. In general, the goal of the project is to emulate enough of a subset of a web browser to be useful for testing and scraping real-world web applications.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp