Apollo vs Azure App Service

Overview

Apollo

Stacks2.7K

Followers1.8K

Votes25

Azure App Service

Stacks312

Followers380

Votes11

Apollo vs Azure App Service: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Scalability: Apollo offers horizontal scalability through sharding, while Azure App Service provides vertical scalability with options to scale up or out based on resource requirements.

2. Pricing Model: Apollo follows a consumption-based pricing model, allowing users to pay per query, whereas Azure App Service has a tiered pricing structure with different levels of resources and features.

3. Deployment Flexibility: Apollo supports deployment on various cloud platforms and on-premises servers, whereas Azure App Service is a fully managed platform-as-a-service (PaaS) offering limited deployment flexibility.

4. Programming Languages: Apollo supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, and JavaScript, while Azure App Service primarily supports languages such as C#, Node.js, and PHP.

5. Extensibility: Apollo provides a more extensible platform with robust GraphQL capabilities and tools, whereas Azure App Service offers integration with various Microsoft services and development tools.

6. Ecosystem Integration: Apollo has a strong integration with Apollo Client and GraphQL tools for a seamless development experience, while Azure App Service integrates well with Azure DevOps for improved CI/CD pipelines and monitoring capabilities.

In Summary, Apollo and Azure App Service differ in scalability, pricing, deployment flexibility, programming languages, extensibility, and ecosystem integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apollo	Azure App Service
Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.	Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.
Statistics
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 312
Followers 1.8K	Followers 380
Votes 25	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 From the creators of Meteor 8 Great documentation 3 Open source 2 Real time if use subscription Cons 1 Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription) 1 File upload is not supported	Pros 6 .Net Framework 5 Visual studio
Integrations
GraphQL	Python .NET Ruby PHP Node.js .NET Core

What are some alternatives to Apollo, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Apollo vs Azure App Service: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Scalability: Apollo offers horizontal scalability through sharding, while Azure App Service provides vertical scalability with options to scale up or out based on resource requirements.

4. Programming Languages: Apollo supports multiple programming languages including Java, Python, and JavaScript, while Azure App Service primarily supports languages such as C#, Node.js, and PHP.

In Summary, Apollo and Azure App Service differ in scalability, pricing, deployment flexibility, programming languages, extensibility, and ecosystem integration.