Apollo vs CapRover

Overview

Apollo

Stacks2.7K

Followers1.8K

Votes25

CapRover

Stacks56

Followers94

Votes54

GitHub Stars14.6K

Forks941

Apollo vs CapRover: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Architecture: Apollo is a GraphQL client that helps manage application state and fetch data from a GraphQL server, while CapRover is a PaaS that helps deploy and manage web applications. Apollo focuses on the client-side interactions and data management, while CapRover focuses on the deployment and management of server-side applications.
Usage: Apollo is typically used in front-end development to interact with GraphQL APIs and manage application state, while CapRover is used in the DevOps space for deployment, scaling, and management of server-side applications and services. Apollo helps developers build and manage client-side applications, while CapRover provides tools for deploying and managing server-side applications.
Scalability: Apollo is designed to help developers scale client-side applications by efficiently managing data and interactions with a GraphQL server, while CapRover is focused on helping developers scale server-side applications by deploying them across multiple instances and managing load balancing and scaling.
Deployment: Apollo is integrated into the client-side application code to help manage data and interactions with a GraphQL server, while CapRover is a separate platform that developers can use to deploy and manage their server-side applications independently from their client-side code.
Community Support: Apollo has a large and active community of developers working with GraphQL and Apollo Client, providing support, tutorials, and resources for building applications, while CapRover has a smaller but dedicated community focused on DevOps, deployment strategies, and server management.
Target Audience: Apollo is primarily targeted towards front-end developers who work with GraphQL and need tools to manage client-side data and interactions, while CapRover caters to DevOps engineers and developers who need a platform to deploy and manage their server-side applications.

In Summary, Apollo and CapRover differ in architecture, usage, scalability, deployment approach, community support, and target audience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apollo	CapRover
Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.	It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.
-	CLI for automation and scripting; Web GUI for ease of access and convenience; No lock-in! Remove CapRover and your apps keep working!; Docker Swarm under the hood for containerization and clustering; Nginx (fully customizable template) under the hood for load-balancing; Let's Encrypt under the hood for free SSL (HTTPS)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 14.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 941
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 56
Followers 1.8K	Followers 94
Votes 25	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 From the creators of Meteor 8 Great documentation 3 Open source 2 Real time if use subscription Cons 1 File upload is not supported 1 Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)	Pros 12 Opensource 12 Mangage complex infrastructure easily 8 Auto SSL 6 Docker 6 Easy instalation
Integrations
GraphQL	MongoDB Docker Node.js PostgreSQL MySQL NGINX Ruby PHP ASP.NET WordPress

What are some alternatives to Apollo, CapRover?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Apollo vs CapRover: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Architecture: Apollo is a GraphQL client that helps manage application state and fetch data from a GraphQL server, while CapRover is a PaaS that helps deploy and manage web applications. Apollo focuses on the client-side interactions and data management, while CapRover focuses on the deployment and management of server-side applications.
Usage: Apollo is typically used in front-end development to interact with GraphQL APIs and manage application state, while CapRover is used in the DevOps space for deployment, scaling, and management of server-side applications and services. Apollo helps developers build and manage client-side applications, while CapRover provides tools for deploying and managing server-side applications.
Scalability: Apollo is designed to help developers scale client-side applications by efficiently managing data and interactions with a GraphQL server, while CapRover is focused on helping developers scale server-side applications by deploying them across multiple instances and managing load balancing and scaling.
Deployment: Apollo is integrated into the client-side application code to help manage data and interactions with a GraphQL server, while CapRover is a separate platform that developers can use to deploy and manage their server-side applications independently from their client-side code.
Community Support: Apollo has a large and active community of developers working with GraphQL and Apollo Client, providing support, tutorials, and resources for building applications, while CapRover has a smaller but dedicated community focused on DevOps, deployment strategies, and server management.
Target Audience: Apollo is primarily targeted towards front-end developers who work with GraphQL and need tools to manage client-side data and interactions, while CapRover caters to DevOps engineers and developers who need a platform to deploy and manage their server-side applications.

In Summary, Apollo and CapRover differ in architecture, usage, scalability, deployment approach, community support, and target audience.

Apollo vs CapRover

Overview