Appcelerator vs React Native

Overview

Appcelerator

Stacks53

Followers70

Votes27

React Native

Stacks34.4K

Followers29.5K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars124.4K

Forks24.9K

Appcelerator vs React Native: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Appcelerator and React Native, there are key differences to consider when choosing a platform for mobile app development.

Programming Language: One of the main differences between Appcelerator and React Native is the programming language used. Appcelerator uses JavaScript while React Native utilizes a combination of JavaScript and JSX for building user interfaces.
Performance: React Native generally provides better performance compared to Appcelerator as it compiles to native code, allowing for smoother animations and faster load times.
Developer Experience: React Native offers a more streamlined developer experience with its hot reloading feature, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without having to recompile the entire app. Appcelerator lacks this feature, making the development process slower.
Community Support: React Native has a larger and more active community compared to Appcelerator, which means developers have access to more resources, libraries, and support when facing challenges during development.
Native Components: React Native allows for more seamless integration of native components into the app, providing a more native look and feel to the final product. Appcelerator may require additional workarounds to achieve the same level of integration.
Cost: Appcelerator requires a license for enterprise-level development, while React Native is open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for many developers.

In Summary, Appcelerator and React Native differ in programming language, performance, developer experience, community support, native components integration, and cost.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Appcelerator, React Native

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Andrea

May 26, 2020

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

Vue Native

React

I'm a huge fan of Vue.js and I'm pretty comfortable with it. I need to build a mobile app for my company and I was now wondering whether I could make use of VueJS with Vue Native instead of switching to React. I know Vue Native builds on top of RN. My question is whether I'd have as much freedom with Vue Native over RN and whether you feel like Vue Native is "production ready" or not. Not sure of which shortcomings I may find using Vue Native... Thanks a lot!!!

336k views336k

Comments

Furqan

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

React Native

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

@{#newbie}|topic:null|

325k views325k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Appcelerator	React Native
Appcelerator is the first mobile platform to combine the flexibility of open source development technologies with the power of cloud services.	React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.
Library of over 20 pre-built common services that are both proven and robust, to reduce integration time and risk, services such as push notification, status updates, photo storage, and social integration, or create your own custom cloud services.;Client-side APIs for any development platform (e.g. Titanium, iOS SDK, Android SDK);Extensibility enabling you to build your own custom cloud application development services in Node.js on the Appcelerator cloud for all your mobile apps.	Native iOS Components;Asynchronous Execution;Touch Handling;Flexbox and Styling; Polyfills
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 124.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 24.9K
Stacks 53	Stacks 34.4K
Followers 70	Followers 29.5K
Votes 27	Votes 1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Android 4 Easy to learn 4 Open Source 2 Great community 2 IOS Cons 1 No online IDE	Pros 214 Learn once write everywhere 174 Cross platform 169 Javascript 122 Native ios components 69 Built by facebook Cons 23 Javascript 19 Built by facebook 12 Cant use CSS 4 30 FPS Limit 2 Slow
Integrations
Crittercism Urban Airship New Relic Hipmob Red Hat OpenShift	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Appcelerator, React Native?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Parse

With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

built.io

Built.io Backend is an mBaaS that allows you to avoid designing, building, and supporting a custom backend for your mobile & web applications. Enterprises can dramatically reduce cost, lower risk and accelerate time-to-market for apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Appcelerator vs React Native: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing Appcelerator and React Native, there are key differences to consider when choosing a platform for mobile app development.

Programming Language: One of the main differences between Appcelerator and React Native is the programming language used. Appcelerator uses JavaScript while React Native utilizes a combination of JavaScript and JSX for building user interfaces.
Performance: React Native generally provides better performance compared to Appcelerator as it compiles to native code, allowing for smoother animations and faster load times.
Developer Experience: React Native offers a more streamlined developer experience with its hot reloading feature, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without having to recompile the entire app. Appcelerator lacks this feature, making the development process slower.
Community Support: React Native has a larger and more active community compared to Appcelerator, which means developers have access to more resources, libraries, and support when facing challenges during development.
Native Components: React Native allows for more seamless integration of native components into the app, providing a more native look and feel to the final product. Appcelerator may require additional workarounds to achieve the same level of integration.
Cost: Appcelerator requires a license for enterprise-level development, while React Native is open-source and free to use, making it a more cost-effective option for many developers.

In Summary, Appcelerator and React Native differ in programming language, performance, developer experience, community support, native components integration, and cost.