StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. Appium vs TestComplete

Appium vs TestComplete

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K
TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0

Appium vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Appium and TestComplete

Appium and TestComplete are both popular automation testing tools used for mobile app testing, but they have some key differences:

  1. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Appium is a cross-platform mobile app automation testing tool that supports both Android and iOS platforms. On the other hand, TestComplete is primarily designed for Windows-based desktop and web applications. While it does have limited support for mobile app testing, it is not as versatile as Appium in terms of cross-platform compatibility.

  2. Programming Language Support: Appium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and more. This allows testers to write test scripts in their preferred language. In contrast, TestComplete primarily supports the proprietary scripting language called "JavaScript-like language," making it less flexible in terms of programming language choices.

  3. Open Source vs Proprietary: Appium is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for everyone to use. TestComplete, on the other hand, is a commercial tool that requires a license for its usage. This difference in licensing models can impact the cost and accessibility of each tool for organizations.

  4. Native and Hybrid App Testing: Appium is specifically designed for testing native, hybrid, and mobile web applications. It provides native implementation for iOS and Android platforms, enabling testers to interact with the application at the same level as a real user. TestComplete, on the other hand, focuses more on desktop and web application testing, although it does offer limited support for mobile app testing.

  5. Device Support: Appium provides extensive support for a wide range of devices, enabling testers to test their applications on real devices, simulators, and emulators. It has integration with cloud-based device testing platforms as well. TestComplete is more limited in terms of device support and primarily relies on physical devices for testing.

  6. Community and Documentation: Appium has a large and active community of developers and testers, which means there is a wealth of community-driven resources, forums, and documentation available for support and learning. TestComplete also has a community and support, but its user base is generally smaller compared to Appium.

In summary, Appium offers cross-platform compatibility, supports multiple programming languages, is open source, specifically designed for mobile app testing, provides extensive device support and has a large community. TestComplete, while primarily for Windows-based applications, supports limited mobile app testing, relies on a proprietary scripting language, requires a license, has limited device support, and a smaller community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appium
Appium
TestComplete
TestComplete

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
650
Stacks
39
Followers
574
Followers
60
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Active community
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla

What are some alternatives to Appium, TestComplete?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana