Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Argo vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?
Introduction
Markdown code is a lightweight markup language that is commonly used to format text on websites. It provides a simple syntax for creating headings, lists, links, and other formatting elements. In this task, we will format the provided content as Markdown code and write about the key differences between Argo and Docker Compose.
Key Differences between Argo and Docker Compose
Workflow Management: Argo is primarily a workflow management tool, whereas Docker Compose is focused on container orchestration. Argo provides a way to define and execute complex workflows involving multiple steps and dependencies, while Docker Compose is mainly used for defining and running multi-container applications.
Scalability: Argo has built-in features for scaling workflows, allowing for parallel execution of tasks and efficient resource allocation. Docker Compose, on the other hand, does not provide native support for scaling application services. It is more suitable for running applications on a single machine or development environment.
Extensibility: Argo provides a flexible and extensible workflow templating system that allows users to define custom logic and conditions for executing steps in a workflow. Docker Compose, on the other hand, has limited extensibility options and is primarily focused on defining the structure and configuration of containers.
Compatibility: Argo is specifically designed to work with Kubernetes and can leverage its features for managing workflow execution. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is containerization platform-agnostic and can work with various container platforms, including Docker, Swarm, and Kubernetes.
Visualization: Argo provides a web-based user interface for visualizing and monitoring workflow execution, making it easier to track the progress of individual steps and identify any issues. Docker Compose, on the other hand, does not have a built-in visualization tool and relies on command-line interface (CLI) tools for managing containers and services.
Orchestration: Argo offers more advanced orchestration capabilities, allowing for complex dependency management, retries, and error handling in workflows. Docker Compose focuses more on defining the structure and configuration of containers, providing basic orchestration features such as service dependencies and restart policies.
In summary, Argo is primarily a workflow management tool with advanced scalability, extensibility, and visualization capabilities, specifically designed to work with Kubernetes. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is a container orchestration tool that focuses on defining multi-container applications and offers basic orchestration features but lacks the advanced capabilities of Argo.
We develop rapidly with docker-compose orchestrated services, however, for production - we utilise the very best ideas that Kubernetes has to offer: SCALE! We can scale when needed, setting a maximum and minimum level of nodes for each application layer - scaling only when the load balancer needs it. This allowed us to reduce our devops costs by 40% whilst also maintaining an SLA of 99.87%.
Pros of Argo
- Open Source3
- Autosinchronize the changes to deploy2
- Online service, no need to install anything1
Pros of Docker Compose
- Multi-container descriptor123
- Fast development environment setup110
- Easy linking of containers79
- Simple yaml configuration68
- Easy setup60
- Yml or yaml format16
- Use Standard Docker API12
- Open source8
- Go from template to application in minutes5
- Can choose Discovery Backend5
- Scalable4
- Easy configuration4
- Kubernetes integration4
- Quick and easy3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Argo
Cons of Docker Compose
- Tied to single machine9
- Still very volatile, changing syntax often5