Argo vs Jenkins X

Overview

Jenkins X

Stacks147

Followers370

Votes16

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks800

Argo

Stacks763

Followers471

Votes6

Argo vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will explore the key differences between Argo and Jenkins X. Both Argo and Jenkins X are tools used in the field of CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) to automate the software development, testing, and deployment processes. However, they offer distinct features and capabilities that set them apart from each other.

Workflow Definition Language: Argo uses a YAML-based workflow definition language that allows users to describe complex workflows with conditional logic, loops, and parallelism. It provides a more flexible and powerful way to define and orchestrate workflows compared to Jenkins X.
Native Kubernetes Integration: Argo is tightly integrated with Kubernetes and can leverage its native features such as pods, services, and secrets. It allows users to define and execute their workflows directly within a Kubernetes cluster, enabling seamless integration with other Kubernetes resources. On the other hand, Jenkins X uses Kubernetes for its underlying infrastructure but does not provide the same level of native integration with Kubernetes as Argo.
GitOps Approach: Jenkins X follows the GitOps approach, where the entire application lifecycle is managed through Git repositories. It simplifies the deployment process by automatically creating environments, managing versioning, and providing a seamless rollback mechanism. Argo, on the other hand, does not explicitly follow the GitOps approach and allows users to define their own workflow management strategies.
Containerization Support: Argo provides comprehensive support for containerization technologies such as Docker and container orchestration systems like Kubernetes. It can seamlessly deploy and manage containerized applications within a Kubernetes cluster. Jenkins X also supports containerization but focuses more on automating the entire CI/CD pipeline for cloud-native applications.
Built-in CI/CD Pipelines: Jenkins X offers built-in support for various CI/CD pipelines, including Jenkins, Tekton, and GitLab CI/CD. It provides a streamlined and opinionated approach to setting up CI/CD pipelines for cloud-native applications. Argo, on the other hand, is more workflow-centric and does not have the same level of built-in CI/CD pipeline support.
Community Support and Maturity: Jenkins X has a larger and more mature community compared to Argo. It has been around for a longer time and has a wide range of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed extensions. Argo, although not as widely adopted as Jenkins X, has been gaining popularity and has an active community contributing to its development and support.

In summary, Argo offers a powerful workflow engine with native Kubernetes integration and comprehensive containerization support. It provides flexibility in defining complex workflows and can seamlessly integrate with existing Kubernetes infrastructure. Jenkins X, on the other hand, follows the GitOps approach and provides a streamlined CI/CD pipeline setup for cloud-native applications, supported by a larger and more mature community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins X, Argo

Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

Fast SBT builds (caching)
Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
Everything as code

Ease of use

181k views181k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins X	Argo
Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes	Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions	DAG or Steps based declaration of workflows;Artifact support (S3, Artifactory, HTTP, Git, raw);Step level input & outputs (artifacts/parameters);Loops;Parameterization;Conditionals;Timeouts (step & workflow level);Retry (step & workflow level);Resubmit (memoized);Suspend & Resume;Cancellation;K8s resource orchestration;Exit Hooks (notifications, cleanup);Garbage collection of completed workflow;Scheduling (affinity/tolerations/node selectors);Volumes (ephemeral/existing);Parallelism limits;Daemoned steps;DinD (docker-in-docker);Script steps
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 800	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 147	Stacks 763
Followers 370	Followers 471
Votes 16	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Kubernetes integration 5 Scripted Pipelines 4 GitOps Cons 1 Complexity	Pros 3 Open Source 2 Autosinchronize the changes to deploy 1 Online service, no need to install anything
Integrations
Kubernetes macOS Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Fedora	Kubernetes Docker

What are some alternatives to Jenkins X, Argo?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

Argo vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Workflow Definition Language: Argo uses a YAML-based workflow definition language that allows users to describe complex workflows with conditional logic, loops, and parallelism. It provides a more flexible and powerful way to define and orchestrate workflows compared to Jenkins X.
Native Kubernetes Integration: Argo is tightly integrated with Kubernetes and can leverage its native features such as pods, services, and secrets. It allows users to define and execute their workflows directly within a Kubernetes cluster, enabling seamless integration with other Kubernetes resources. On the other hand, Jenkins X uses Kubernetes for its underlying infrastructure but does not provide the same level of native integration with Kubernetes as Argo.
GitOps Approach: Jenkins X follows the GitOps approach, where the entire application lifecycle is managed through Git repositories. It simplifies the deployment process by automatically creating environments, managing versioning, and providing a seamless rollback mechanism. Argo, on the other hand, does not explicitly follow the GitOps approach and allows users to define their own workflow management strategies.
Containerization Support: Argo provides comprehensive support for containerization technologies such as Docker and container orchestration systems like Kubernetes. It can seamlessly deploy and manage containerized applications within a Kubernetes cluster. Jenkins X also supports containerization but focuses more on automating the entire CI/CD pipeline for cloud-native applications.
Built-in CI/CD Pipelines: Jenkins X offers built-in support for various CI/CD pipelines, including Jenkins, Tekton, and GitLab CI/CD. It provides a streamlined and opinionated approach to setting up CI/CD pipelines for cloud-native applications. Argo, on the other hand, is more workflow-centric and does not have the same level of built-in CI/CD pipeline support.
Community Support and Maturity: Jenkins X has a larger and more mature community compared to Argo. It has been around for a longer time and has a wide range of plugins, integrations, and community-contributed extensions. Argo, although not as widely adopted as Jenkins X, has been gaining popularity and has an active community contributing to its development and support.

Argo vs Jenkins X

Overview