StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. ASP.NET Core vs Blazor

ASP.NET Core vs Blazor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Blazor
Blazor
Stacks549
Followers724
Votes445
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Stacks11.0K
Followers2.7K
Votes1.6K

ASP.NET Core vs Blazor: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Performance: One of the key differences between ASP.NET Core and Blazor is the performance. ASP.NET Core is a server-side framework that processes requests on the server and sends the rendered HTML to the client. On the other hand, Blazor is a client-side framework that runs on the client's web browser using WebAssembly. This allows Blazor to execute code directly on the client, resulting in faster load times and improved performance.

  2. Key difference 2: Language: Another significant difference between ASP.NET Core and Blazor is the programming language used. ASP.NET Core primarily uses C# for server-side development. In contrast, Blazor allows developers to write client-side web applications using C# and Razor syntax, eliminating the need to use JavaScript. This makes it easier for developers who are already familiar with C# to build full-stack web applications.

  3. Key difference 3: User Interface: ASP.NET Core is focused on server-side rendering, where the HTML is generated on the server and sent to the client. In contrast, Blazor utilizes a component-based approach for building user interfaces, similar to modern JavaScript frameworks like React or Angular. With Blazor, developers can create reusable UI components that are rendered on the client-side, enhancing the interactivity and responsiveness of the application.

  4. Key difference 4: Framework Size: ASP.NET Core is a lightweight framework that offers only the essential components for building web applications. This minimalistic approach results in a smaller framework size, faster startup times, and efficient resource usage. On the other hand, Blazor includes the complete .NET runtime required for executing C# code on the client-side, leading to a larger framework size and potentially longer load times.

  5. Key difference 5: Development Workflow: ASP.NET Core follows a traditional server-side development workflow, where developers write code, compile it, and then deploy the application to a server. Blazor, being a client-side framework, allows for a more streamlined development workflow. Developers can write and test the code directly in the browser, without requiring a separate compilation and deployment step. This enables faster iteration and prototyping during the development process.

  6. Key difference 6: Cross-platform and Mobile Capabilities: ASP.NET Core is known for its cross-platform capabilities, allowing developers to build web applications that can run on Windows, Linux, and macOS. However, when it comes to mobile application development, Blazor has the upper hand. Blazor offers the ability to build native mobile applications using frameworks like Xamarin, leveraging the power of C# and the .NET ecosystem for mobile development.

In Summary, ASP.NET Core is a server-side framework focused on performance and traditional development workflow, while Blazor is a client-side framework that leverages WebAssembly and offers a component-based approach for building user interfaces. Blazor also provides the advantage of using C# for both client-side and mobile application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Blazor, ASP.NET Core

Arman
Arman

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonReactReact

As a medium level .Net programmer trying to implementing a website, I decided to go through the Asp.Net Core. I found some tutorials on the web and started learning; however, I faced a problem. Even though I have been working with .Net and C# (mostly with unity game engine, which led to a quite amazing mobile game, published on a Persian app store) for two years or even more, by start learning Asp.Net Core, I found out that I do not know .Net as much as I expected. There were some things I should have learned before.

I searched for other frameworks, and Django was a popular one. Besides, I have planned to learn Python for machine learning. The website I want to make (with a small team) is nearly similar to Khan Academy. (We are going to use React for front-end)

So, What should I do? Continue working on .Net core with its amazing new features, or start getting into the Python and Django?

Your advice accompanied by reasons will be greatly appreciated!

424k views424k
Comments
Korawich
Korawich

Apr 7, 2020

Needs advice

I have a mission to make a web application for my organization (engineering consultant). With the following bullet points that the new web app has to cover, what is the right tool?

  1. It should be able to display employee data and project data. For example, when searching the name of Mr. Peter Parker, I should be able to click on the name to see his personal profile and also a list of construction projects he is or was a part of. Also, if I click on a project name, say Project ABC building, it should show me the detail of this project (who is the client, who works on this project, where, start-finish dates, etc.)

  2. It should be able to sync with the database from Microsoft Access.

(optional) 3. The user of this web app should be able to propose a rotation of role (Ex. Boss might want Mr. Peter Paker to work in another project next month, he can just drag Peter into XYZ Building.)

296k views296k
Comments
Taimoor
Taimoor

Associate Software Engineer at Intech Process Automation

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReactPythonPython

For context, I currently use JavaScript (React) and Python (Flask) in my daily routine.

I need your help in choosing either Spring Boot or ASP.NET Core. Both frameworks seem to have mature ecosystems. I would like to hear your thoughts on the following points:

  • Difficulty level of both frameworks
  • Level of community support
  • Career prospects i.e do Spring based jobs pay more or vice versa
  • which one will be helpful if I decide to transition towards a more specialized field like data engineering.

I am asking this because it is something that I am also exploring in parallel. I know that Python and #SQL play a huge role in big data.

794k views794k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Blazor
Blazor
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
-
Statistics
Stacks
549
Stacks
11.0K
Followers
724
Followers
2.7K
Votes
445
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 63
    Uses C#
  • 49
    No need to learn separate language or technology
  • 42
    Supports making a single page application
  • 40
    Tight integration with .NET project
  • 38
    Uses .NET standard library
Cons
  • 4
    Initial load time
  • 2
    Hard to inject javascript
Pros
  • 143
    C#
  • 118
    Performance
  • 96
    Open source
  • 90
    NuGet
  • 84
    Easy to learn and use
Cons
  • 5
    Great Doc
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Professionally written Nuget Packages, vs IMPORT junk
  • 2
    Clean
  • 1
    Long polling is difficult to implement
Integrations
.NET
.NET
C#
C#
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Linux
Linux
Docker
Docker
macOS
macOS
NGINX
NGINX
.NET
.NET
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Windows
Windows
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Blazor, ASP.NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase