StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Assertible vs Refit

Assertible vs Refit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Assertible
Assertible
Stacks10
Followers21
Votes0
Refit
Refit
Stacks113
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks770

Assertible vs Refit: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Key differences between Assertible and Refit are highlighted below:

1. **Pricing Structure**: Assertible offers a free plan for basic monitoring and testing with additional paid plans for more features, while Refit is completely open-source and free to use without any subscription or payment requirements.
2. **Focus on API Testing**: Assertible specializes in API testing, providing extensive tooling and features specifically tailored for API endpoint testing and monitoring, whereas Refit caters to APIs but is not exclusively focused on API testing.
3. **Integration Capabilities**: Assertible has seamless integrations with popular tools like GitHub, Slack, and Bitbucket for easy integration into development workflows, while Refit may require more manual setup for integrations with external tools and services.
4. **User Interface Experience**: Assertible prides itself on a user-friendly and intuitive interface for test creation and result visualization, making it easy for users to navigate and understand the testing process, whereas Refit may have a simpler UI design with fewer features.
5. **Subscription Management**: Assertible offers subscription management features that allow users to easily upgrade, downgrade, or cancel their plans directly from the platform, providing flexibility and control over their subscription, which may not be as robust in Refit.
6. **Compliance and Security**: Assertible adheres to strict compliance and security standards to ensure the protection of user data and test results, giving users confidence in the handling of sensitive information, a aspect that might not be as emphasized in Refit.

In Summary, the key differences between Assertible and Refit revolve around the pricing structure, focus on API testing, integration capabilities, user interface experience, subscription management, and compliance/security standards. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Assertible
Assertible
Refit
Refit

Reduce bugs in web applications by using Assertible to create an automated QA pipeline that helps you catch failures & ship code faster.

The automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, It turns your REST API into a live interface.

Integrate with your favorite tools; Automate your QA like a pro; Run the same tests on all environments
Dynamic headers; Authorization (Dynamic Headers redux)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
770
Stacks
10
Stacks
113
Followers
21
Followers
30
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
Postman
Postman
Haskell
Haskell
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Assertible, Refit?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope