Atlas vs TortoiseHg: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Data Model: Atlas uses a document-based data model where data is stored in JSON-like documents, while TortoiseHg uses a distributed version control data model with changesets and repositories.

2. Scalability: Atlas is designed for horizontal scalability, meaning it can easily handle growing amounts of data by adding more servers to distribute the load, whereas TortoiseHg is more suited for smaller teams and projects due to its limitations in scaling.

3. Query Language: Atlas supports a rich query language, MongoDB Query Language (MQL), which allows for complex queries and aggregations, while TortoiseHg lacks a dedicated query language, relying more on GUI tools for query interactions.

4. Branching and Merging: TortoiseHg excels in branching and merging workflows with features like named branches and bookmarks, making it easier to work on separate tasks concurrently and merge changes efficiently, whereas Atlas focuses more on document handling and aggregation rather than traditional version control features.

5. Hosting options: Atlas is a cloud-based database service provided by MongoDB, offering cloud-hosted and managed database solutions, while TortoiseHg needs to be self-hosted or hosted on a third-party server, requiring more setup and maintenance.

6. Community and Support: TortoiseHg has a dedicated community and support system for Mercurial version control, providing extensive documentation and forums for users, whereas Atlas, being a MongoDB service, relies more on MongoDB's overall community and support resources for assistance.

```markdown
In Summary, Atlas and TortoiseHg differ in their data models, scalability, query languages, branching and merging capabilities, hosting options, and community support.