Atom vs CodeRunner

Overview

Atom

Stacks16.9K

Followers14.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars60.8K

Forks17.3K

CodeRunner

Stacks18

Followers53

Votes0

Atom vs CodeRunner: What are the differences?

User Interface: Atom offers a more customizable user interface with numerous themes and packages available, allowing users to personalize their coding environment to suit their preferences. CodeRunner, on the other hand, has a more streamlined and simple user interface, which may appeal to users looking for a more focused coding experience without the need for extensive customization options.
Language Support: Atom supports a wide range of programming languages and has built-in support for various syntax highlighting and auto-completion features. In contrast, CodeRunner also supports multiple programming languages but may lack the extensive language support and customization options compared to Atom.
Debugging Tools: Atom provides users with a range of plugins and packages for debugging code, making it a versatile choice for developers who require advanced debugging capabilities. CodeRunner, however, offers a more simplified approach to debugging, with basic debugging tools that may be sufficient for simpler coding tasks but may not meet the needs of more complex projects.
Community and Support: Atom benefits from a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, themes, and support resources, making it easier for users to find solutions to their coding problems. CodeRunner may have a smaller user base and community support compared to Atom, which could impact the availability of resources and assistance for users.
Price: Atom is an open-source code editor that is free to use, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users. CodeRunner, however, is a paid application available for purchase, which may be a consideration for users looking for a cost-effective coding tool.
Performance: Atom can be perceived as slower compared to CodeRunner, which is designed for faster execution and performance, making it a suitable choice for users who prioritize speed and efficiency in their coding workflow.

In summary, Atom and CodeRunner differ in terms of user interface customization, language support, debugging tools, community support, price, and performance, making them suitable for different user preferences and coding requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Atom, CodeRunner

Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k

Comments

René

Sr. Financial Analyst

Aug 21, 2020

Review

I have used and like them both... here's my take on what to use in your case.

Use whatever software your instructor is using when learning a language. It makes it simpler to start. Then change to whatever you like.
Use an IDE (Integrated Development Enviroment). For Java I'd pick InteliJ (because I have found the Jetbrains IDEs great) or Visual Studio as a second pick (because it's free for individual coders).
Pick your text editor: the Atom vs Notepad++, vs others question Both Atom and Notepad++ offer many features and add-ons, making it a long-disputed competition. This is what drives to chose between one and the other, and I have been alternating: On Atom: The good:

Good looking coding environment
Good autocomplete
Project focused structure to your files The bad:
Higher system resources usage
Slower loading time (if you are opening and closing)

Notepad++ The good:

Very light system resources use
Fast and simple, with decent code higlighting
Loads very fast The bad:
Not as pretty as Atom
Autocomplete and syntax checking is not that good
File-focused editing

479 views479

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atom	CodeRunner
At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.	It is a slick, great-looking editor that lets you compose and test code in just about any language you can throw at it
Atom is a desktop application based on web technologies;Node.js integration;Modular Design- composed of over 50 open-source packages that integrate around a minimal core;File system browser;Fuzzy finder for quickly opening files;Fast project-wide search and replace;Multiple cursors and selections;Multiple panes;Snippets;Code folding;A clean preferences UI;Import TextMate grammars and themes	Advanced Code Completion; Run Code in Any Language; Debugging with Breakpoints
Statistics
GitHub Stars 60.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 17.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.9K	Stacks 18
Followers 14.5K	Followers 53
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 529 Free 449 Open source 343 Modular design 321 Hackable 316 Beautiful UI Cons 19 Slow with large files 7 Slow startup 2 Most of the time packages are hard to find. 1 Cannot Run code with F5 1 No longer maintained	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub	JavaScript OpenFL Perl Ruby C# C++ Java UltraEdit TSLint Kite

What are some alternatives to Atom, CodeRunner?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

gedit

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Related Comparisons

Atom vs CodeRunner: What are the differences?

User Interface: Atom offers a more customizable user interface with numerous themes and packages available, allowing users to personalize their coding environment to suit their preferences. CodeRunner, on the other hand, has a more streamlined and simple user interface, which may appeal to users looking for a more focused coding experience without the need for extensive customization options.
Language Support: Atom supports a wide range of programming languages and has built-in support for various syntax highlighting and auto-completion features. In contrast, CodeRunner also supports multiple programming languages but may lack the extensive language support and customization options compared to Atom.
Debugging Tools: Atom provides users with a range of plugins and packages for debugging code, making it a versatile choice for developers who require advanced debugging capabilities. CodeRunner, however, offers a more simplified approach to debugging, with basic debugging tools that may be sufficient for simpler coding tasks but may not meet the needs of more complex projects.
Community and Support: Atom benefits from a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, themes, and support resources, making it easier for users to find solutions to their coding problems. CodeRunner may have a smaller user base and community support compared to Atom, which could impact the availability of resources and assistance for users.
Price: Atom is an open-source code editor that is free to use, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users. CodeRunner, however, is a paid application available for purchase, which may be a consideration for users looking for a cost-effective coding tool.
Performance: Atom can be perceived as slower compared to CodeRunner, which is designed for faster execution and performance, making it a suitable choice for users who prioritize speed and efficiency in their coding workflow.

Atom vs CodeRunner

Overview