Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Atom vs gedit: What are the differences?
Extension Support: Atom provides extensive support for extensions, allowing users to customize and enhance their experience with a wide range of plugins and themes. On the other hand, gedit has a limited selection of plugins and themes, which may not offer the same level of customization as Atom.
Built-in Git Integration: Atom comes with built-in Git integration, allowing users to work seamlessly with version control systems directly within the text editor. Gedit, however, requires external plugins or tools to achieve similar functionality, making it less convenient for users who frequently use version control.
Performance: Atom is known to be slower and consume more system resources compared to gedit, which is a lightweight text editor. This difference in performance may be noticeable, especially on older or lower-spec devices, making gedit a preferred choice for users looking for a fast and efficient editing experience.
Community and Support: Atom has a larger and more active community of developers and users compared to gedit, which means more resources, tutorials, and user-generated content are available for Atom users. This active community can be beneficial for troubleshooting issues, seeking help, or discussing features and updates within the user base.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Atom is built using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it easier to run on multiple platforms without significant modifications. On the other hand, gedit is primarily designed for Linux systems and may require additional setup or tweaking to work efficiently on other operating systems, limiting its cross-platform compatibility.
Customization Options: Atom offers more extensive customization options, allowing users to tweak nearly every aspect of the editor, from keybindings to themes to layouts. Gedit, while customizable to a certain extent, may not provide as many options or flexibility in tailoring the user experience to individual preferences.
In Summary, Atom and gedit differ in extension support, built-in Git integration, performance, community support, cross-platform compatibility, and customization options.
Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark
I use Visual Studio Code every day, it was very refreshing coming from Atom to get a lightweight, all i need setup right out of the box.
After working with Atom for around 2 years I switch to VSCode.
Here is why:
- Color display of variables in code. This may now sound much, but it improve the display of scss variables and its a core feature.
- Out of the box features.
- Automation! VSCode suggests usefull things to you.
- Integraded console. I love the console in VSCode. It is faster than my 'default' cmd on Windows. For Atom you would have to install a package, that doesn't work so well on Windows.
- Output logging per Plugin.
- Setup time. In VSCode I can set up my workspace in under 5 minutes. For Atom I need
- Plugins work perfect out of the box. This is a mayor one for me. For example: In order to set up Editorconfig you have to adjust mutliple values and plugins to get it work. Plugin creators of Editorconfig for Atom are not to blame: They include a linter, that verifies whether the settings are correct or not.
- Git implementation. VSCode ships with Git and even if the git packet of vscode doesn't look like much, theres a lot to it. For example you can watch changes inline.
- Minimap and vertical scrollbar. This feature is much better implementet in VSCode and you don't need an extra plugin.
- Auto completion. Sass mixins example:
@include
and you press CTRL+SPACE and VSCode shows you every Sass mixin. - Copy paths from open file tab. In VSCode you can copy the path of an file directly when you have it open. In atom you need to select 'show in tree view' and than copy the path or relative path.
- Tree view. The tree view VSCode automaticly brings you to the current open file by default. This helps when working with components.
- File search. The file search supports the asterisk so you can search for eg
molecule-*.ts
. - Tasks support. Tasks are integrated in VSCode so eg. for Typescript you can
CTRL + SHIFT + B
and selecttsc: watch - tsconfig.ts
. - Short waiting time. For example when deleting files or beautifying 20.000 lines of json (Atom hangs up).
- More releases. Faster feature implementation. Active community.
Pros of Atom
- Free529
- Open source449
- Modular design343
- Hackable321
- Beautiful UI316
- Backed by github147
- Built with node.js119
- Web native113
- Community107
- Packages35
- Cross platform18
- Nice UI5
- Multicursor support5
- TypeScript editor5
- Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable3
- cli start3
- Simple but powerful3
- Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR3
- Snippets3
- Code readability2
- It's powerful2
- Awesome2
- Smart TypeScript code completion2
- Well documented2
- works with GitLab1
- "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness1
- full support1
- vim support1
- Split-Tab Layout1
- Apm publish minor1
- Consistent UI on all platforms1
- User friendly1
- Hackable and Open Source1
- Publish0
Pros of gedit
- Fast10
- Lightweight9
- GNOME Integration9
- Syntax Highlighting5
- Immediately starts3
- Tabbed UI3
- Free2
- I love gnu-linux2
- External tools and snippets1
- Supports every programming language1
- Spell Check1
- If you took cs50, you know gedit1
- Old gedit based on gtk21
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Atom
- Slow with large files19
- Slow startup7
- Most of the time packages are hard to find.2
- No longer maintained1
- Cannot Run code with F51
- Can be easily Modified1
Cons of gedit
- GTK32