StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Atom vs Monaco Editor

Atom vs Monaco Editor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atom
Atom
Stacks16.9K
Followers14.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars60.8K
Forks17.3K
Monaco Editor
Monaco Editor
Stacks57
Followers172
Votes17
GitHub Stars44.5K
Forks3.9K

Atom vs Monaco Editor: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown, we will compare the key differences between Atom and Monaco Editor.

1. **Programming Language Support**: Atom supports a wide range of programming languages out of the box with various language-specific packages available for installation. On the other hand, Monaco Editor is primarily focused on web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with limited support for other languages.
   
2. **Customizability and Extensibility**: Atom is highly customizable with a vast library of themes and packages that can be easily integrated to enhance functionality. Monaco Editor, being a part of VS Code, has a more limited scope for customization but offers a streamlined experience without the need for extensive configurations.

3. **Performance**: Atom, being built on Electron, is known for its high memory consumption and slower loading times, especially on older machines. Monaco Editor, being web-based, offers faster performance and quicker loading times compared to Atom.

4. **Collaborative Capabilities**: Atom provides collaboration tools through packages that allow users to work together in real-time on the same project. In contrast, Monaco Editor lacks built-in collaborative features, requiring external solutions for collaborative coding.

5. **Code IntelliSense and Debugging**: Monaco Editor, being closely tied to VS Code, offers superior IntelliSense and debugging capabilities compared to Atom. It provides comprehensive code completion suggestions, real-time error checking, and advanced debugging tools.

6. **Embedded Editor Integration**: Monaco Editor is often integrated directly into web applications to provide in-browser code editing functionalities, while Atom is primarily used as a standalone desktop application for coding projects.

In Summary, Atom and Monaco Editor differ in terms of language support, customizability, performance, collaboration tools, IntelliSense, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Atom, Monaco Editor

Andrey
Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k
Comments
René
René

Sr. Financial Analyst

Aug 21, 2020

Review

I have used and like them both... here's my take on what to use in your case.

  1. Use whatever software your instructor is using when learning a language. It makes it simpler to start. Then change to whatever you like.
  2. Use an IDE (Integrated Development Enviroment). For Java I'd pick InteliJ (because I have found the Jetbrains IDEs great) or Visual Studio as a second pick (because it's free for individual coders).
  3. Pick your text editor: the Atom vs Notepad++, vs others question Both Atom and Notepad++ offer many features and add-ons, making it a long-disputed competition. This is what drives to chose between one and the other, and I have been alternating: On Atom: The good:
  • Good looking coding environment
  • Good autocomplete
  • Project focused structure to your files The bad:
  • Higher system resources usage
  • Slower loading time (if you are opening and closing)

Notepad++ The good:

  • Very light system resources use
  • Fast and simple, with decent code higlighting
  • Loads very fast The bad:
  • Not as pretty as Atom
  • Autocomplete and syntax checking is not that good
  • File-focused editing
483 views483
Comments
Shail
Shail

None at None

Oct 19, 2020

Review

Hi, I have used PyCharm, Sublime Text and Atom. PyCharm is very heavy and it contains many extra functions which have not any use for beginner. Atom has slow startup but after that is runs smoothly but not recommended for weak hardware. Atom has great community and bunch plugin support. You can manually install plugins in atom with you need. Sublime Text is really very fast and I think it can smoothly run on weak hardware. I personally using Atom on one computer and VScode on other computer both are great but VScode has better startup time.

At end IDE is not going to make you a pro. When I was beginner I used notepad and then Atom for working fast. I used a simple text editor named MousePad for many months because I got syntax highlighting for mine very weak PC.

460 views460
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atom
Atom
Monaco Editor
Monaco Editor

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

The Monaco Editor is the code editor that powers VS Code. It is licensed under the MIT License and supports IE 9/10/11, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Opera.

Atom is a desktop application based on web technologies;Node.js integration;Modular Design- composed of over 50 open-source packages that integrate around a minimal core;File system browser;Fuzzy finder for quickly opening files;Fast project-wide search and replace;Multiple cursors and selections;Multiple panes;Snippets;Code folding;A clean preferences UI;Import TextMate grammars and themes
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
60.8K
GitHub Stars
44.5K
GitHub Forks
17.3K
GitHub Forks
3.9K
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
57
Followers
14.5K
Followers
172
Votes
2.5K
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 529
    Free
  • 449
    Open source
  • 343
    Modular design
  • 321
    Hackable
  • 316
    Beautiful UI
Cons
  • 19
    Slow with large files
  • 7
    Slow startup
  • 2
    Most of the time packages are hard to find.
  • 1
    Cannot Run code with F5
  • 1
    Can be easily Modified
Pros
  • 6
    Out of the Box Intellisense
  • 4
    More features than Ace
  • 3
    Power vscode, with all it's features
  • 2
    Microsoft Product
  • 1
    Accessibility
Cons
  • 7
    Microsoft
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Safari
Safari
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Atom, Monaco Editor?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

gedit

gedit

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana