Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Aurelia vs Svelte: What are the differences?
Introduction
When it comes to front-end development, Aurelia and Svelte are both popular choices among developers. However, there are key differences between the two that can influence a developer's choice when deciding on a framework to use.
Language Choice: One key difference between Aurelia and Svelte is the programming languages they use. Aurelia is written in ECMAScript 6 (ES6) and TypeScript, while Svelte is written in a language called Svelte, which is then compiled to highly efficient JavaScript code during build time.
Approach to DOM Updates: Aurelia follows a reactive approach to updating the DOM, where changes trigger updates to the UI. In contrast, Svelte takes a compile-time approach, where the framework compiles the code to optimized JavaScript that updates the DOM directly rather than through a virtual DOM.
Bundle Size: Svelte shines in terms of bundle size compared to Aurelia. Svelte's compiler optimizes and removes unnecessary code during the build process, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and improved performance.
Learning Curve: Aurelia has a steeper learning curve compared to Svelte. Svelte's simplicity and intuitive syntax make it easier for developers to pick up and start building applications quickly.
Community and Ecosystem: Aurelia has a mature community and ecosystem, while Svelte's community is relatively new but rapidly growing. Developers might find more resources and plugins available for Aurelia, while Svelte's ecosystem is expanding with time.
Reactivity: While both Aurelia and Svelte support reactivity, Svelte offers a more efficient way of handling reactivity through its reactive declarations and functions, resulting in better performance in complex applications.
In Summary, Aurelia and Svelte differ in their language choice, approach to DOM updates, bundle size, learning curve, community and ecosystem, and reactivity handling.
Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.
Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.
It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.
This is going to be used with the application.
for old/ lite devices . ie. * android tv, * micro linux, * possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer * android go devices * android One devices
Pros of Aurelia
- Simple with conventions47
- Modern architecture42
- Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework39
- Extensible31
- Integrates well with other components28
- Easy to use27
- Dependency Injection25
- Modular22
- Great router20
- Adaptive Data Binding16
- Typescript, ES2015, ES201613
- IoC, Modularity, Simplicity, Full Stack11
- Good binding system9
- Based on ES79
- Testable6
- Convention based6
- Quick to develop5
- Solid Documentation4
- Evolving standards compliance4
- Smooth learning curve4
- Outstanding Support (paid)4
- Reactive binding system1
- TypeScript1
Pros of Svelte
- Performance59
- Reactivity41
- Components36
- Simplicity35
- Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)34
- Lightweight30
- Near to no learning curve28
- Real Reactivity26
- Fast as vanilajs26
- All in one22
- Compiler based18
- Use existing js libraries18
- SSR17
- Scalable16
- Very easy for beginners16
- Composable13
- No runtime overhead12
- Ease of use12
- Built in store10
- Typescript9
- Start with pure html + css7
- Best Developer Experience7
- Templates6
- Speed4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Aurelia
Cons of Svelte
- Event Listener Overload3
- Little to no libraries2
- Complex2
- Learning Curve2
- Hard to learn2