StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodeCommit vs AWS CodePipeline

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs AWS CodePipeline: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Deployment Process: The key difference between AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodePipeline is the nature of their deployment processes. CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that allows developers to store and manage their code repositories. On the other hand, CodePipeline is a fully-managed continuous delivery service that automates the build, test, and deployment processes of applications.
  2. 2. Source Code Management: CodeCommit primarily focuses on source code management, providing features such as version control, branch management, and repository management. It allows developers to collaborate and manage their code securely. In contrast, CodePipeline does not provide source code management but integrates with CodeCommit to retrieve the source code for the build and deployment processes.
  3. 3. Pipeline Stages: CodeCommit does not have the concept of stages or pipeline steps. It serves as a centralized repository for storing and managing code. On the contrary, CodePipeline is designed around the concept of a pipeline, which consists of multiple stages. Each stage represents a step in the deployment process, such as build, test, and deploy. CodePipeline allows for more granular control and customization of the deployment workflow.
  4. 4. Automation: While CodeCommit provides version control and collaboration capabilities, it does not automate the entire deployment process. CodePipeline, on the other hand, automates the build, test, and deployment processes, reducing the manual effort required for deploying applications. It automatically triggers the pipeline when changes are pushed to the code repository, enabling a continuous delivery workflow.
  5. 5. Integration: CodeCommit integrates with other AWS services and tools, such as AWS CodeBuild for building applications and AWS CodeDeploy for deployment. However, these integrations need to be configured separately. CodePipeline, on the other hand, provides out-of-the-box integration with various AWS services, including CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy. This seamless integration simplifies the setup and configuration of the deployment pipeline.
  6. 6. Pipeline Visualization: CodeCommit does not offer a visualization of the deployment pipeline. Developers can view the repository contents, commit history, and branches, but they cannot visualize the entire deployment workflow. CodePipeline, on the other hand, provides a graphical representation of the pipeline, allowing developers to visualize the different stages and their dependencies. This visualization helps in understanding and troubleshooting the deployment process.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit is a source code management service, while AWS CodePipeline is a continuous delivery service that automates the entire build, test, and deployment processes through a pipeline. CodeCommit focuses on repository management, whereas CodePipeline automates the deployment workflow, integrating with various AWS services, and providing pipeline visualization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks
551
Stacks
324
Followers
933
Followers
826
Votes
30
Votes
193
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    No fork
  • 2
    No webhooks
Integrations
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeCommit?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana