StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Version Control System
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs SVN (Subversion)

AWS CodePipeline vs SVN (Subversion)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Stacks791
Followers629
Votes43
GitHub Stars614
Forks188
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

AWS CodePipeline and SVN (Subversion) are two popular tools used in software development for managing code and automating the deployment process. AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service, while SVN is a centralized version control system.

  1. Hosting: AWS CodePipeline is a cloud-based service hosted on Amazon Web Services, offering scalability and flexibility, whereas SVN requires a dedicated server for hosting the repository.
  2. Workflow: CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deployment process by creating a pipeline of actions, while SVN focuses on version control and tracking changes within the codebase.
  3. Integration: CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, and GitHub, enabling a complete CI/CD workflow, whereas SVN has limited integration capabilities with other tools and services.
  4. Branching: SVN uses branching and merging to manage different versions of the codebase, allowing developers to work on different features concurrently, while CodePipeline focuses on automating the deployment process rather than managing branches.
  5. Scalability: CodePipeline is highly scalable, capable of handling complex workflows and deployments for large projects, while SVN may face performance issues and limitations when dealing with a large number of files and concurrent users.
  6. Ease of Use: CodePipeline provides a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with AWS services, making it easy to set up and manage pipelines, while SVN has a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration and maintenance.

In Summary, AWS CodePipeline and SVN differ in terms of hosting, workflow, integration, branching, scalability, and ease of use, catering to different needs in software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

-
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
GitHub Stars
614
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
188
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
791
Stacks
551
Followers
629
Followers
933
Votes
43
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free
Cons
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
No integrations available
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to SVN (Subversion), AWS CodePipeline?

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana