AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk

1.2K
660
+ 1
230
Google App Engine
Google App Engine

2.6K
1.7K
+ 1
606
Add tool

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Developers describe AWS Elastic Beanstalk as "Quickly deploy and manage applications in the AWS cloud". Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring. On the other hand, Google App Engine is detailed as "Build web applications on the same scalable systems that power Google applications". Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine can be primarily classified as "Platform as a Service" tools.

Some of the features offered by AWS Elastic Beanstalk are:

  • Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java
  • There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.
  • Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application

On the other hand, Google App Engine provides the following key features:

  • Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.
  • Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.
  • You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.

"Integrates with other aws services" is the top reason why over 74 developers like AWS Elastic Beanstalk, while over 140 developers mention "Easy to deploy" as the leading cause for choosing Google App Engine.

Snapchat, Accenture, and Movielala are some of the popular companies that use Google App Engine, whereas AWS Elastic Beanstalk is used by Accenture, Sellsuki, and Close. Google App Engine has a broader approval, being mentioned in 481 company stacks & 343 developers stacks; compared to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, which is listed in 374 company stacks and 118 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

What is Google App Engine?

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
Why do developers choose Google App Engine?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

What are the cons of using AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
What are the cons of using Google App Engine?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What companies use Google App Engine?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What tools integrate with Google App Engine?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine?
    AWS CodeDeploy
    AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    Azure App Service
    Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.
    AWS CloudFormation
    You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine
    Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

    With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less. And it is free (until you need extra scale). I would not recommend to use Java - python is faster and has all new appengine features.

    Pros: everything is in one place: task queue, cron, backend instances for data processing, datastore, mapreduce. Cons: you cannot easily move your code from GAE. Even with special 3rd party services.

    Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

    With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less.

    How developers use AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine
    Avatar of Casey Smith
    Casey Smith uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

    PaaS for back-end components, including external data ingestion APIs, front-end web service APIs, hosting of static front-end application assets, back-end data processing pipeline microservices, APIs to storage infrastructure (Cloud SQL and Memcached), and data processing pipeline task queues and cron jobs. Task queue fan-out and auto-scaling of back-end microservice instances provide parallelism for high velocity data processing.

    Avatar of Lawrence Cheuk
    Lawrence Cheuk uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

    checking a swap require a lot of cpu resource, roster normally come out same day of month, every month, at a particular time. Which make very high spike, our flag ship product, iSwap, with the capability looking swap possibility with 10000 other rosters base on user critieria, you need a cloud computing give you this magnitude of computing power. gae did it nicely, user friendly, easy to you, low cost.

    Avatar of ONLICAR
    ONLICAR uses AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Elastic Beanstalk gives us a managed platform for our front end servers to make sure that traffic is never overloading our servers and that deployments are always successful.

    Avatar of CommentBox.io
    CommentBox.io uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

    App engine fills in the gaps in the increasingly smaller case where it's necessary for us to run our own APIs.

    Avatar of Lumanu
    Lumanu uses AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Elastic Beanstalk manages our environments. We rely on it to manage rolling out new versions of services.

    Avatar of Flux Work
    Flux Work uses AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Easy to get started. Essentially a package of several AWS products integrated for you.

    Avatar of Abhijeet Gokar
    Abhijeet Gokar uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

    Very easy to make cloud computing of ML models , and use containers like Kubernetes.

    Avatar of Vamsi Krishna
    Vamsi Krishna uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

    Cloud instances to run our app, Cloud MySQL , Network Load Balancer

    Avatar of Daniel Pupius
    Daniel Pupius uses AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Elastic Beanstalk

    For convenience I use Elastic Beanstalk to host all my sites.

    Avatar of Undisclosed, Do Not Contact or Spam Please
    Undisclosed, Do Not Contact or Spam Please uses AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Elastic Beanstalk

    All server-side deployments go to one of 5 EB environments.

    How much does AWS Elastic Beanstalk cost?
    How much does Google App Engine cost?
    Pricing unavailable