StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine are both Platform as a Service (PaaS) offerings that allow developers to quickly deploy and manage their applications on the cloud. However, there are key differences between the two services that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility in terms of infrastructure options. It allows developers to customize the underlying infrastructure, choose from a wide range of EC2 instance types, and integrate with other AWS services. On the other hand, Google App Engine abstracts away the infrastructure details and provides automatic scalability, making it easier to scale applications without worrying about provisioning and managing resources.

  2. Pricing Model: AWS Elastic Beanstalk follows an a-la-carte pricing model, where each AWS resource (such as EC2 instances, S3 buckets, etc.) is billed separately. This gives developers more control over cost optimization, but requires more management and monitoring. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more bundled pricing model, where the cost includes both infrastructure and platform services. This can make it simpler to estimate costs, but may be less flexible for organizations with specific resource needs.

  3. Supported Languages and Runtimes: AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers support for a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and runtimes such as Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and more. It provides a more language-agnostic approach, making it suitable for multi-language environments. On the other hand, Google App Engine focuses more on specific languages and runtimes, primarily supporting Java, Python, Go, and Node.js. It provides tighter integration with Google Cloud services, but may be less suitable for organizations with diverse technology stacks.

  4. Deployment Process: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides more flexibility in terms of deployment options. It supports various deployment methods such as direct file uploads, Git integration, Docker containers, and more. This allows developers to choose the most suitable deployment process for their applications. In contrast, Google App Engine has a more streamlined deployment process, focusing on deploying code using Google Cloud SDK or through integration with popular development tools such as Maven or Gradle.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides detailed monitoring and logging capabilities through integration with AWS CloudWatch. It allows developers to collect, monitor, and analyze application logs and performance metrics. Google App Engine also provides monitoring and logging features, but it leverages Google Cloud Monitoring and Google Cloud Logging services for this purpose. The choice between the two services may depend on the organization's existing monitoring and logging infrastructure.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility and customization options, a la carte pricing, and support for a wide range of languages and runtimes. Google App Engine, on the other hand, provides automatic scalability, bundled pricing, closer integration with Google Cloud services, and a streamlined deployment process. The choice between the two services depends on the specific needs and preferences of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google App Engine, AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Mehdi
Mehdi

Managing Director at Gigadrive

Sep 17, 2022

Decided

Platform.sh has great out-of-the-box support for PHP apps (especially Symfony, as it was made by the same people). Elastic Beanstalk does not have a lot of compelling PaaS features like Platform.sh. There, you have to install a lot of PHP extensions manually for example, while Platform.sh just handles it for you based on your config. Elastic Beanstalk also has terrible version updates (see link).

13.6k views13.6k
Comments
Alejandro
Alejandro

May 13, 2022

Review

I recently came across a training course on using Django and React together. That got me thinking about how to serve up the project and remember that Heroku had a great interface for serving up my Django/Python App so I would think it should work. Figured I would throw in my 2 cents, not sure if it helps.

1.26k views1.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
2.1K
Followers
8.1K
Followers
1.8K
Votes
611
Votes
241
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

CapRover

CapRover

It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase