Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Glue vs Splunk: What are the differences?
Introduction
In the world of cloud computing, AWS Glue and Splunk are two popular platforms that offer different solutions for data management and analytics. AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics. Splunk on the other hand is a powerful log management and analysis tool that helps businesses gain insights from their machine-generated data. While both platforms have their own unique features and capabilities, there are several key differences that set them apart.
Data Processing Approach: AWS Glue is primarily designed for ETL processes, making it ideal for transforming and preparing structured and semi-structured data. It provides an easy-to-use interface for creating and managing ETL jobs, and offers features like automatic schema discovery and data type inference. Splunk, on the other hand, focuses more on real-time data processing and analysis. It specializes in ingesting and indexing large volumes of machine-generated data in various formats, such as logs, metrics, and event data.
Data Sources: AWS Glue supports a wide range of data sources including various databases (both on-premises and in the cloud), data warehouses, and Amazon S3. It also has built-in connectors for popular data sources like Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon Aurora. Splunk, on the other hand, is versatile when it comes to data sources and can ingest data from virtually any source that generates machine data. It supports a wide range of log formats, network protocols, and data inputs out-of-the-box.
Data Transformation Capabilities: While both AWS Glue and Splunk offer data transformation capabilities, AWS Glue provides a more comprehensive set of tools and features. It supports a wide range of transformation types, such as filtering, cleansing, joining, and aggregation, allowing users to easily prepare their data for analysis. Splunk, on the other hand, offers a limited set of transformation functions primarily focused on extracting and manipulating fields from log data.
Scalability and Performance: AWS Glue is a fully managed service that automatically scales resources based on data volume and processing needs. It can handle large-scale data processing and parallel execution of multiple ETL jobs. Splunk also offers scalability and high-performance capabilities, but it requires more infrastructure configuration and optimization to handle large-scale data ingestion and real-time analysis.
Built-in Analytics and Visualization: AWS Glue is primarily focused on data preparation and ETL processes, and does not provide built-in analytics and visualization capabilities. It is designed to integrate with other AWS services like Amazon Athena and Amazon QuickSight for data analytics and visualization. Splunk, on the other hand, offers powerful analytics and visualization tools out-of-the-box. It provides a wide range of dashboards, charts, and reports to help users analyze and visualize their data.
Pricing Model: AWS Glue follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources consumed and the number of ETL jobs executed. Splunk, on the other hand, uses a different licensing model based on data volume or event throughput. It offers both perpetual and subscription-based licenses with different tiers based on data storage and retention requirements.
In summary, AWS Glue and Splunk offer different solutions for data management and analytics. AWS Glue is a fully managed ETL service focused on data preparation, while Splunk is a powerful log management and analysis tool. The key differences between the two include their data processing approach, data sources supported, data transformation capabilities, scalability and performance, built-in analytics and visualization, and pricing model.
We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to
- keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
- give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
- move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments
We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.
You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.
But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.
Though we have always built something custom, Apache airflow (https://airflow.apache.org/) stood out as a key contender/alternative when it comes to open sources. On the commercial offering, Amazon Redshift combined with Amazon Kinesis (for complex manipulations) is great for BI, though Redshift as such is expensive.
You may want to look into a Data Virtualization product called Conduit. It connects to disparate data sources in AWS, on prem, Azure, GCP, and exposes them as a single unified Spark SQL view to PowerBI (direct query) or Tableau. Allows auto query and caching policies to enhance query speeds and experience. Has a GPU query engine and optimized Spark for fallback. Can be deployed on your AWS VM or on prem, scales up and out. Sounds like the ideal solution to your needs.
I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?
Hi all,
Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?
you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster
First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.
Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.
I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.
It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift
you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved
Pros of AWS Glue
- Managed Hive Metastore9
Pros of Splunk
- API for searching logs, running reports3
- Alert system based on custom query results3
- Splunk language supports string, date manip, math, etc2
- Dashboarding on any log contents2
- Custom log parsing as well as automatic parsing2
- Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc2
- Rich GUI for searching live logs2
- Ability to style search results into reports2
- Granular scheduling and time window support1
- Query any log as key-value pairs1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS Glue
Cons of Splunk
- Splunk query language rich so lots to learn1