QMetry vs Axcept Comparison | StackShare | StackShare

Axcept vs QMetry

Overview

QMetry

Stacks16

Followers34

Votes0

Axcept

Stacks1

Followers1

Votes0

QMetry vs Axcept: What are the differences?

Developers describe QMetry as "Designed for agile testing and DevOps teams to build, manage, and deploy quality software". It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles. On the other hand, Axcept is detailed as "A simple and intuitive way to build and execute UI tests". It helps you to spot every bug by visually comparing screenshots. No matter if it's an unwanted UI change or a broken feature.

QMetry can be classified as a tool in the "Test Management" category, while Axcept is grouped under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by QMetry are:

TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT
TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT
TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT

On the other hand, Axcept provides the following key features:

Automated UI testing
Simple
No coding or programming required

Detailed Comparison

QMetry	Axcept
It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles	It helps you to spot every bug by visually comparing screenshots. No matter if it's an unwanted UI change or a broken feature.
TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.	Automated UI testing; Simple; No coding or programming required; Preview and inspect while you build to ensure your tests run seamlessly
Statistics
Stacks 16	Stacks 1
Followers 34	Followers 1
Votes 0	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Cons 1 Some terms and processes are confusing 1 Slow and clunky	No community feedback yet
Integrations
TestFlight UserTesting Jira TestNG	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to QMetry, Axcept?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.