StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure App Service vs Azure Websites

Azure App Service vs Azure Websites

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Stacks404
Followers404
Votes23
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks312
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs Azure Websites: What are the differences?

Azure App Service vs Azure Websites

Azure App Service and Azure Websites are two services offered by Microsoft Azure for hosting web applications. While both services provide similar functionality, there are key differences between them that set them apart.

  1. Scalability: Azure App Service allows you to easily scale your application horizontally by adding more instances, and vertically by upgrading to a higher service plan. On the other hand, Azure Websites only supports scaling vertically by changing the size of the web hosting plan.

  2. Deployment Options: With Azure App Service, you have more flexibility in terms of deployment options. You can choose to deploy your application using various methods such as continuous integration, Git deployment, Docker containers, or FTP/S. Azure Websites, however, only supports deployment through FTP/S or Git.

  3. Custom Domains: Azure App Service provides support for custom domains, allowing you to use your own domain name for your web application. Azure Websites, on the other hand, does not have this feature and you can only use the default azurewebsites.net domain.

  4. Traffic Routing: Azure App Service also offers more advanced traffic routing capabilities through features like Traffic Manager and Azure Front Door. These features allow you to distribute traffic across different regions or endpoints based on specific rules. Azure Websites does not have these capabilities.

  5. Integration: Azure App Service provides integration with other Azure services such as Azure Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Search. This allows you to easily build and connect your web application with other Azure components. Azure Websites, however, does not offer this level of integration.

  6. Support for Frameworks: Azure App Service offers support for a wider range of frameworks and programming languages, including .NET, Java, Node.js, Python, and PHP. Azure Websites, on the other hand, has limited support and is primarily focused on hosting websites built using ASP.NET or PHP.

In summary, Azure App Service offers more flexibility, scalability, and advanced features compared to Azure Websites. It provides support for custom domains, advanced traffic routing, integration with other Azure services, and a wider range of frameworks and programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

Azure Websites is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables you to build, deploy and scale enterprise-grade web Apps in seconds. Focus on your application code, and let Azure take care of the infrastructure to scale and securely run it for you.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

.NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python;Built-in AutoScale and Load Balancing;High Availability with Auto-Patching;Continuous Deployment with Git, TFS, GitHub;SQL Databases, MySQL, DocumentDB, Search, MongoDB;WordPress, Umbraco, Joomla, Drupal
-
Statistics
Stacks
404
Stacks
312
Followers
404
Followers
380
Votes
23
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Ease of deployment
  • 6
    Free plans for students
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Azure Websites, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase