StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Azure App Service vs Paz

Azure App Service vs Paz

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Paz
Paz
Stacks0
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars7
Forks4
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks313
Followers380
Votes11

Azure App Service vs Paz: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When choosing a platform for deploying and managing applications, Azure App Service and Paz are two popular options. While both offer various features to support application deployment, there are key differences between the two that could influence your decision-making process.

  1. Deployment Options: Azure App Service provides a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution, which offers a fully managed platform for application deployment without the need to manage the underlying infrastructure. On the other hand, Paz is more focused on providing a container-based deployment platform, allowing for more flexibility and control over the deployment environment.

  2. Scalability: Azure App Service offers built-in auto-scaling features that allow applications to automatically scale based on demand. This makes it easy to handle sudden spikes in traffic without manual intervention. In contrast, Paz requires users to manually configure and manage scaling settings, which can be more time-consuming and complex.

  3. Service Integrations: Azure App Service integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure SQL Database and Azure Storage. This makes it easy to build and deploy applications that leverage these services. On the other hand, Paz may require more manual configuration and setup to integrate with external services or databases.

  4. Pricing Structure: Azure App Service offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay only for the resources they use. This can be cost-effective for applications with fluctuating traffic patterns. In comparison, Paz may have a different pricing structure that could be less flexible or offer fewer cost-saving options.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: Azure App Service provides built-in monitoring and logging features, making it easier to troubleshoot and analyze application performance. Paz may require users to set up additional monitoring tools or services to achieve the same level of visibility into application metrics and logs.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Azure App Service benefits from being part of the larger Azure ecosystem, which includes extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support resources. In contrast, Paz may have a smaller community or fewer resources available for troubleshooting and getting help with deployment issues.

In Summary, when choosing between Azure App Service and Paz, consider factors such as deployment options, scalability, service integrations, pricing structure, monitoring capabilities, and community support to determine the best fit for your specific application deployment needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Paz
Paz
Azure App Service
Azure App Service

A pluggable in-house service platform with a PaaS-like workflow, built on Docker, CoreOS, Etcd and Fleet.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

A web front-end to CoreOS' Fleet with a PaaS-like workflow;Like a clustered/multi-host Dokku;Beautiful web UI;Run anywhere (Vagrant, public cloud or bare metal);No special code required in your services;Built for Continuous Deployment;Zero-downtime deployments;Service discovery
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
0
Stacks
313
Followers
5
Followers
380
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

What are some alternatives to Paz, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase