Azure Container Service vs Cloud9 IDE

Overview

AWS Cloud9

Stacks522

Followers714

Votes673

Azure Container Service

Stacks97

Followers214

Votes11

Azure Container Service vs Cloud9 IDE: What are the differences?

Scalability: Azure Container Service provides high scalability by allowing users to create, configure, and manage a cluster of VMs to run containerized applications efficiently. On the other hand, Cloud9 IDE is primarily a cloud-based Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that focuses on code editing and collaboration, lacking the scalability features of Azure Container Service.
Container Orchestration: Azure Container Service supports various container orchestration tools such as Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and DC/OS, providing users with flexibility in managing their containers effectively. In contrast, Cloud9 IDE does not offer built-in container orchestration capabilities, limiting its functionality in orchestrating containerized applications efficiently.
Resource Management: Azure Container Service enables users to optimize resource allocation and management for their containerized workloads through efficient cluster management and monitoring tools. Cloud9 IDE, being an IDE focused on code editing, lacks the robust resource management features provided by Azure Container Service.
Integration with Azure Services: Azure Container Service seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Portal, Azure Monitor, and Azure Security Center, allowing users to leverage the full capabilities of the Azure ecosystem. In comparison, Cloud9 IDE may not offer the same level of integration with Azure services, limiting its interoperability within the Azure cloud environment.
Cost Management: Azure Container Service offers multiple pricing options and cost management tools to help users optimize their container deployment costs based on usage and requirements. On the contrary, Cloud9 IDE may have limited cost management features specifically tailored for containerized workloads, potentially leading to less efficient cost optimization strategies.
Performance Monitoring: Azure Container Service provides comprehensive performance monitoring tools and metrics for users to track the performance of their containerized applications and clusters in real-time. In contrast, Cloud9 IDE may not offer the same level of performance monitoring capabilities, making it less suitable for performance-critical containerized workloads.

In Summary, Azure Container Service and Cloud9 IDE differ significantly in scalability, container orchestration, resource management, integration with Azure services, cost management, and performance monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Cloud9	Azure Container Service
Cloud9 provides a development environment in the cloud. Cloud9 enables developers to get started with coding immediately with pre-setup environments called workspaces, collaborate with their peers with collaborative coding features, and build web apps with features like live preview and browser compatibility testing. It supports more than 40 languages, with class A support for PHP, Ruby, Python, JavaScript/Node.js, and Go.	Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.
Real-time collaboration and chat;Connect via SSH and FTP;Code Completion (suggestions);Highlighting and syntax hints;Goto File- fast file access;Adaptive Themes- chnage themes and skin;Code Folding- folding arrows allow you to collapse code;Multiple cursors- add a cursor to the rows above and below the current line;Focus- Every part of the Cloud9 UI can be collapsed or hidden entirely, so you get the maximum space to focus on your code. And for the truly exceptional among us, there’s zen mode, where the editor floats above the IDE to fill 100% of the browser.;Drag & Drop- The project tree scrolls, highlights and expands folders automatically for the most natural drag n drop experience.;Command-Line- command-line is your shortcut to a ton of useful features, like "mkdir", "npm", "git" and "zen";Git and Mercurial support;Seamless Node.js Integration	Create a container hosting solution optimized for Azure;Scale and orchestrate applications using Apache Mesos or Docker Swarm;Use popular open source, client-side tooling;Migrate container workloads to and from Azure without code changes
Statistics
Stacks 522	Stacks 97
Followers 714	Followers 214
Votes 673	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 108 Easy to use 102 Free 76 Nice UI 65 Terminal access to vm instead of simulation 58 New full ubuntu machines Cons 6 Not free	Pros 6 Easy to setup, very agnostic 3 It supports Kubernetes, Mesos DC/OS and Docker Swarm 2 It has a nice command line interface (CLI) tool
Integrations
Heroku GitHub Bitbucket Red Hat OpenShift Microsoft Azure	Docker Swarm Docker Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to AWS Cloud9, Azure Container Service?

Red Hat Codeready Workspaces

Built on the open Eclipse Che project, Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces provides developer workspaces, which include all the tools and the dependencies that are needed to code, build, test, run, and debug applications.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Koding

Koding is a feature rich cloud-based development environment complete with free VMs, an attractive IDE & sudo level terminal access!

Nitrous.IO

Get setup lightning fast in the cloud & code from anywhere, on any machine.

Codeanywhere

A development platform that enables you to not only edit your files from underlying services like FTP, GitHub, Dropbox and the like, but on top of that gives you the ability to collaborate, embed and share through Codeanywhere on any device.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Codio

Every project gets its own Box: an instantly available server-side development environment with full terminal access. With features such as forking, collaboration, importing from Git repos and more, Codio strives to remove as many barriers as possible to create a platform developers will enjoy using as their IDE of choice.

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Eclipse Che

Eclipse Che makes Kubernetes development accessible for developer teams, providing one-click developer workspaces and eliminating local environment configuration for your entire team.

CodeSandbox

CodeSandbox allows developers to simply go to a URL in their browser to start building. This not only makes it easier to get started, it also makes it easier to share. You can just share your created work by sharing the URL, others can then (without downloading) further develop on these sandboxes.

Related Comparisons

Azure Container Service vs Cloud9 IDE: What are the differences?

Scalability: Azure Container Service provides high scalability by allowing users to create, configure, and manage a cluster of VMs to run containerized applications efficiently. On the other hand, Cloud9 IDE is primarily a cloud-based Integrated Development Environment (IDE) that focuses on code editing and collaboration, lacking the scalability features of Azure Container Service.
Container Orchestration: Azure Container Service supports various container orchestration tools such as Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and DC/OS, providing users with flexibility in managing their containers effectively. In contrast, Cloud9 IDE does not offer built-in container orchestration capabilities, limiting its functionality in orchestrating containerized applications efficiently.
Resource Management: Azure Container Service enables users to optimize resource allocation and management for their containerized workloads through efficient cluster management and monitoring tools. Cloud9 IDE, being an IDE focused on code editing, lacks the robust resource management features provided by Azure Container Service.
Integration with Azure Services: Azure Container Service seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Portal, Azure Monitor, and Azure Security Center, allowing users to leverage the full capabilities of the Azure ecosystem. In comparison, Cloud9 IDE may not offer the same level of integration with Azure services, limiting its interoperability within the Azure cloud environment.
Cost Management: Azure Container Service offers multiple pricing options and cost management tools to help users optimize their container deployment costs based on usage and requirements. On the contrary, Cloud9 IDE may have limited cost management features specifically tailored for containerized workloads, potentially leading to less efficient cost optimization strategies.
Performance Monitoring: Azure Container Service provides comprehensive performance monitoring tools and metrics for users to track the performance of their containerized applications and clusters in real-time. In contrast, Cloud9 IDE may not offer the same level of performance monitoring capabilities, making it less suitable for performance-critical containerized workloads.

Azure Container Service vs Cloud9 IDE

Overview