StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Cosmos DB vs Celery

Azure Cosmos DB vs Celery

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Celery
Celery
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes280
GitHub Stars27.5K
Forks4.9K
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Stacks594
Followers1.1K
Votes130

Azure Cosmos DB vs Celery: What are the differences?

1. Data Model: Azure Cosmos DB is a NoSQL database service that offers a schema-agnostic database for applications, allowing for flexibility in data structure. On the other hand, Celery is a distributed task queue that handles asynchronous tasks in a distributed manner, primarily used in Python applications.

2. Use Case: Azure Cosmos DB is ideal for globally distributed applications that require low latency access to data in multiple regions, offering multi-region replication. In contrast, Celery is commonly used for background task processing in web applications, such as sending emails or processing data.

3. Consistency Model: Azure Cosmos DB provides five levels of consistency to choose from based on the needs of the application, including strong and eventual consistency. Celery relies on its message broker for task queuing and execution, allowing for flexibility in handling task consistency.

4. Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing for automatic and manual scaling of throughput and storage based on application needs. Celery can also scale horizontally by adding more worker nodes to handle an increased load of asynchronous tasks.

5. Cost Structure: Azure Cosmos DB follows a pricing model based on provisioned throughput and consumed storage, with options for manual and automatic throughput provisioning. Celery is open-source and free to use, with costs incurred for additional resources such as message brokers and task results storage.

6. Ecosystem Integration: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Azure services and tools, such as Azure Functions and Logic Apps, for building serverless applications. Celery can be integrated with various Python frameworks and libraries, such as Django and Flask, for adding asynchronous task processing to web applications.

In Summary, Azure Cosmos DB and Celery differ in their data model flexibility, use cases, consistency models, scalability options, cost structures, and ecosystem integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Celery
Celery
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

-
Fully managed with 99.99% Availability SLA;Elastically and highly scalable (both throughput and storage);Predictable low latency: <10ms @ P99 reads and <15ms @ P99 fully-indexed writes;Globally distributed with multi-region replication;Rich SQL queries over schema-agnostic automatic indexing;JavaScript language integrated multi-record ACID transactions with snapshot isolation;Well-defined tunable consistency models: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, and Eventual
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
594
Followers
1.6K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
280
Votes
130
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Task queue
  • 63
    Python integration
  • 40
    Django integration
  • 30
    Scheduled Task
  • 19
    Publish/subsribe
Cons
  • 4
    Sometimes loses tasks
  • 1
    Depends on broker
Pros
  • 28
    Best-of-breed NoSQL features
  • 22
    High scalability
  • 15
    Globally distributed
  • 14
    Automatic indexing over flexible json data model
  • 10
    Always on with 99.99% availability sla
Cons
  • 18
    Pricing
  • 4
    Poor No SQL query support
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure Machine Learning
Azure Machine Learning
MongoDB
MongoDB
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Celery, Azure Cosmos DB?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase