StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Cosmos DB vs RabbitMQ

Azure Cosmos DB vs RabbitMQ

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Stacks21.8K
Followers18.9K
Votes558
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks4.0K
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Stacks594
Followers1.1K
Votes130

Azure Cosmos DB vs RabbitMQ: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare Azure Cosmos DB and RabbitMQ, highlighting the key differences between them.

  1. Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is a globally-distributed, multi-model database service offered by Microsoft, designed for high scalability and low latency. It can horizontally scale and distribute data across multiple regions with a click of a button. On the other hand, RabbitMQ is a messaging broker that enables applications to communicate and exchange messages. It focuses on scalable and reliable message queuing with support for a variety of messaging patterns.

  2. Data Models: Azure Cosmos DB is a NoSQL database service that supports multiple data models, including key-value, document, column-family, and graph. It allows developers to choose the most suitable data model based on their application requirements. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, doesn't provide built-in support for different data models. It primarily focuses on message exchange between applications.

  3. Real-time Streaming: Azure Cosmos DB provides integrated support for real-time streaming and change feed. It allows developers to build real-time applications by consuming the change feed and reacting to database changes in near-real-time. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, doesn't have built-in support for real-time streaming. It primarily focuses on asynchronous messaging and decoupling applications.

  4. Persistence: Azure Cosmos DB provides built-in persistence with guaranteed durability of data. It automatically replicates data across multiple regions to ensure high availability and fault tolerance. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, doesn't directly provide persistence. It relies on message acknowledgments and durable queues to ensure reliable message delivery in case of failures.

  5. Querying and Indexing: Azure Cosmos DB supports rich querying capabilities with SQL-like language (SQL API) or APIs specific to each data model. It also supports automatic indexing and schemaless data storage. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, doesn't focus on querying and indexing. It primarily provides message routing and delivery mechanisms.

  6. Message Durability: RabbitMQ provides message durability through persistent message queues. Messages can survive broker restarts and crashes by persisting them onto disk. Azure Cosmos DB, on the other hand, focuses on data durability by replicating and distributing data across multiple regions. It doesn't directly provide persistent message queues like RabbitMQ.

In summary, Azure Cosmos DB is a globally-distributed, multi-model database service designed for high scalability, real-time streaming, and rich querying capabilities. RabbitMQ, on the other hand, is a messaging broker focused on scalable and reliable message queuing without built-in support for different data models or advanced querying.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RabbitMQ, Azure Cosmos DB

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Meili
Meili

Software engineer at Digital Science

Sep 24, 2020

Needs adviceonZeroMQZeroMQRabbitMQRabbitMQAmazon SQSAmazon SQS

Hi, we are in a ZMQ set up in a push/pull pattern, and we currently start to have more traffic and cases that the service is unavailable or stuck. We want to:

  • Not loose messages in services outages
  • Safely restart service without losing messages (@{ZeroMQ}|tool:1064| seems to need to close the socket in the receiver before restart manually)

Do you have experience with this setup with ZeroMQ? Would you suggest RabbitMQ or Amazon SQS (we are in AWS setup) instead? Something else?

Thank you for your time

500k views500k
Comments
André
André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported
Fully managed with 99.99% Availability SLA;Elastically and highly scalable (both throughput and storage);Predictable low latency: <10ms @ P99 reads and <15ms @ P99 fully-indexed writes;Globally distributed with multi-region replication;Rich SQL queries over schema-agnostic automatic indexing;JavaScript language integrated multi-record ACID transactions with snapshot isolation;Well-defined tunable consistency models: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, and Eventual
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21.8K
Stacks
594
Followers
18.9K
Followers
1.1K
Votes
558
Votes
130
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 235
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 80
    Ease of configuration
  • 60
    I like the admin interface
  • 52
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 22
    Durable
Cons
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow
Pros
  • 28
    Best-of-breed NoSQL features
  • 22
    High scalability
  • 15
    Globally distributed
  • 14
    Automatic indexing over flexible json data model
  • 10
    Always on with 99.99% availability sla
Cons
  • 18
    Pricing
  • 4
    Poor No SQL query support
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure Machine Learning
Azure Machine Learning
MongoDB
MongoDB
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ, Azure Cosmos DB?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase