Azure Functions vs Flyway: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
Integration with Microsoft Azure: Azure Functions is a serverless compute service that enables you to run event-triggered code without having to explicitly provision or manage infrastructure. On the other hand, Flyway is an open-source database migration tool that allows for version control and automated deployment of database schema changes.
Primary Use Case: Azure Functions are primarily used for building event-driven solutions and microservices, allowing developers to focus on writing code without the need to worry about managing servers. Meanwhile, Flyway is designed specifically for managing database schema changes, making it ideal for DevOps teams working on database-related projects.
Scalability: Azure Functions can automatically scale based on demand, meaning that resources are dynamically allocated to handle increases in workload. In contrast, Flyway does not have built-in scalability features as it is focused on managing database migrations in a controlled manner.
Programming Languages Supported: Azure Functions support a wide range of programming languages including C#, Java, JavaScript, Python, and PowerShell, providing flexibility for developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with. In comparison, Flyway is language-agnostic and can be used with any database that supports JDBC, making it versatile but not tied to specific programming languages.
Deployment Strategy: Azure Functions are typically deployed as individual functions within a serverless application, allowing for easy deployment and management of discrete units of code. Flyway, on the other hand, is usually integrated into the deployment pipeline of a database project, ensuring that database schema changes are applied consistently across different environments.
Cost Model: Azure Functions follow a consumption-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of executions and resources consumed by their functions. In contrast, Flyway is open-source and free to use, with optional commercial support available for enterprise customers.
In Summary, Azure Functions and Flyway differ in their integration with Microsoft Azure, primary use case, scalability, programming languages supported, deployment strategy, and cost model.
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.
Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic.
Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added.
Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers.
Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.
We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.
Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :)
Thanks in advance!
It lets you regain control of your database migrations with pleasure and plain sql. Solves only one problem and solves it well. It migrates your database, so you don't have to worry about it anymore.
Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
Supported databases: Oracle, SQL Server, SQL Azure, DB2, DB2 z/OS, MySQL, MariaDB, Google Cloud SQL, PostgreSQL, Redshift, Vertica, H2, Hsql, Derby, SQLite;Supported build tools: Maven, Gradle, Ant and SBT;Works on: Windows, Mac OSX, Linux, Java and Android
Easily schedule event-driven tasks across services;Expose Functions as HTTP API endpoints;Scale Functions based on customer demand;Develop how you want, using a browser-based UI or existing tools;Get continuous deployment, remote debugging, and authentication out of the box
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
305
Stacks
785
Followers
563
Followers
705
Votes
33
Votes
62
Pros & Cons
Pros
13
Superb tool, easy to configure and use
9
Very easy to config, great support on plain sql scripts
6
Is fantastic and easy to install even with complex DB
4
Simple and intuitive
1
Easy tool to implement incremental migration
Cons
3
"Undo Migrations" requires pro version, very expensive