Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Functions vs Sequelize: What are the differences?
Performance: Azure Functions provide a serverless compute service that scales based on demand, allowing for better performance handling fluctuating workloads. Sequelize, on the other hand, is an ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) library for Node.js that assists in interacting with databases, offering more control over performance optimizations at the application level.
Function Type: Azure Functions are event-driven, allowing developers to define specific functions to trigger based on events. Sequelize, however, focuses on data modeling and querying, enabling structured interactions with databases through model definitions.
Scalability: Azure Functions automatically scale based on incoming events or requests, ensuring high availability and scalability without manual intervention. Sequelize's scalability relies on the underlying database system and data modeling strategies chosen by the developer.
Cost Structure: Azure Functions operate on a consumption-based billing model, where you only pay for the resources consumed by your functions. Sequelize is open-source and typically does not incur direct costs, aside from potential database hosting expenses.
Supported Integrations: Azure Functions seamlessly integrate with other Azure services and third-party tools, offering a wide range of capabilities and extensibility options. Sequelize primarily focuses on database integrations and offers compatibility with various SQL and NoSQL databases.
Development Flexibility: Azure Functions enable rapid development of small, focused functions that can be independently deployed and managed. Sequelize, as an ORM, provides a structured approach to database interactions but may require additional configuration for complex data models or queries.
In Summary, Azure Functions excel in serverless event-driven computing with flexible scalability, cost-efficient billing, and seamless integrations, while Sequelize offers robust data modeling capabilities and fine-grained control over database interactions.
Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.
Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic. Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added. Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers. Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.
We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.
Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :) Thanks in advance!
I recommend this : -Spring reactive for back end : the fact it's reactive (async) it consumes half of the resources that a sync platform needs (so less CPU -> less money). -Angular : Web Front end ; it's gives you the possibility to use PWA which is a cheap replacement for a mobile app (but more less popular). -Docker images. -Kubernetes to orchestrate all the containers. -I Use Jenkins / blueocean, ansible for my CI/CD (with Github of course) -AWS of course : u can run a K8S cluster there, make it multi AZ (availability zones) to be highly available, use a load balancer and an auto scaler and ur good to go. -You can store data by taking any managed DB or u can deploy ur own (cheap but risky).
You pay less money, but u need some technical 2 - 3 guys to make that done.
Good luck
My advice will be Front end: React Backend: Language: Java, Kotlin. Database: SQL: Postgres, MySQL, Aurora NOSQL: Mongo db. Caching: Redis. Public : Spring Webflux for async public facing operation. Admin api: Spring boot, Hibrernate, Rest API. Build Container image. Kuberenetes: AWS EKS, AWS ECS, Google GKE. Use Jenkins for CI/CD pipeline. Buddy works is good for AWS. Static content: Host on AWS S3 bucket, Use Cloudfront or Cloudflare as CDN.
Serverless Solution: Api gateway Lambda, Serveless Aurora (SQL). AWS S3 bucket.
Pros of Azure Functions
- Pay only when invoked14
- Great developer experience for C#11
- Multiple languages supported9
- Great debugging support7
- Can be used as lightweight https service5
- Easy scalability4
- WebHooks3
- Costo3
- Event driven2
- Azure component events for Storage, services etc2
- Poor developer experience for C#2
Pros of Sequelize
- Good ORM for node.js42
- Easy setup31
- Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite21
- Open source14
- Free13
- Promise Based11
- Recommend for mongoose users4
- Typescript3
- Atrocious documentation, buggy, issues closed by bots3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Functions
- No persistent (writable) file system available1
- Poor support for Linux environments1
- Sporadic server & language runtime issues1
- Not suited for long-running applications1
Cons of Sequelize
- Docs are awful30
- Relations can be confusing10