Azure Monitor vs Cacti

Overview

Cacti

Stacks89

Followers202

Votes10

Azure Monitor

Stacks60

Followers184

Votes0

Azure Monitor vs Cacti: What are the differences?

Data Collection and Monitoring Granularity: Azure Monitor allows real-time data collection and monitoring with more granularity, providing minute-by-minute monitoring capabilities, whereas Cacti relies on polling intervals which can lead to data being sampled at fixed intervals, often ranging from 5 minutes to 30 minutes.
Alerting Capabilities: Azure Monitor provides a robust alerting system with customizable thresholds and actions based on configurable criteria, enabling immediate notifications of issues, while Cacti's alerting capabilities are more limited and may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve similar functionality.
Integration with Azure Services: Azure Monitor seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Log Analytics, Application Insights, and Azure Automation, enabling a comprehensive approach to monitoring Azure resources, whereas Cacti primarily focuses on network monitoring and may require additional plugins or configurations to monitor cloud-based services effectively.
Scalability and Flexibility: Azure Monitor offers scalability and flexibility by allowing users to store vast amounts of monitoring data in Azure Monitor Logs, enabling powerful analytics and visualization capabilities, while Cacti may face scalability issues when dealing with a large number of devices or metrics, as it relies on traditional RRDtool for data storage.
Ease of Use and Setup: Azure Monitor provides a user-friendly interface and easy setup process, offering pre-configured monitoring solutions for various Azure resources with minimal configuration required, whereas Cacti may require more manual setup and configuration, including setting up data sources, graphs, and templates before monitoring can be effectively implemented.
Supported Environments: Azure Monitor is tailored for monitoring Azure cloud services and resources, offering native support for Azure-specific metrics and integrations, while Cacti is more suitable for monitoring traditional on-premises network infrastructure and may require additional customization to monitor cloud-based environments effectively.

In Summary, Azure Monitor and Cacti differ significantly in terms of data collection granularity, alerting capabilities, integration with Azure services, scalability, ease of use, and supported environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cacti	Azure Monitor
Cacti is a complete network graphing solution designed to harness the power of RRDTool's data storage and graphing functionality. Cacti provides a fast poller, advanced graph templating, multiple data acquisition methods, and user management features out of the box.	It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.
Unlimited number of graph items can be defined for each graph optionally utilizing CDEFs or data sources from within cacti.;Automatic grouping of GPRINT graph items to AREA, STACK, and LINE[1-3] to allow for quick re-sequencing of graph items.;Auto-Padding support to make sure graph legend text lines up.;Graph data can be manipulated using the CDEF math functions built into RRDTool. These CDEF functions can be defined in cacti and can be used globally on each graph.;Data sources can be created that utilize RRDTool's "create" and "update" functions. Each data source can be used to gather local or remote data and placed on a graph.	Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
Stacks 89	Stacks 60
Followers 202	Followers 184
Votes 10	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Rrdtool based 3 Free 2 Fast poller 1 Graphs from snmp 1 Graphs from language independent scripts	No community feedback yet
Integrations
RRDtool	Jira Azure DevOps PagerDuty BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Cacti, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

Azure Monitor vs Cacti: What are the differences?

Data Collection and Monitoring Granularity: Azure Monitor allows real-time data collection and monitoring with more granularity, providing minute-by-minute monitoring capabilities, whereas Cacti relies on polling intervals which can lead to data being sampled at fixed intervals, often ranging from 5 minutes to 30 minutes.
Alerting Capabilities: Azure Monitor provides a robust alerting system with customizable thresholds and actions based on configurable criteria, enabling immediate notifications of issues, while Cacti's alerting capabilities are more limited and may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve similar functionality.
Integration with Azure Services: Azure Monitor seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Log Analytics, Application Insights, and Azure Automation, enabling a comprehensive approach to monitoring Azure resources, whereas Cacti primarily focuses on network monitoring and may require additional plugins or configurations to monitor cloud-based services effectively.
Scalability and Flexibility: Azure Monitor offers scalability and flexibility by allowing users to store vast amounts of monitoring data in Azure Monitor Logs, enabling powerful analytics and visualization capabilities, while Cacti may face scalability issues when dealing with a large number of devices or metrics, as it relies on traditional RRDtool for data storage.
Ease of Use and Setup: Azure Monitor provides a user-friendly interface and easy setup process, offering pre-configured monitoring solutions for various Azure resources with minimal configuration required, whereas Cacti may require more manual setup and configuration, including setting up data sources, graphs, and templates before monitoring can be effectively implemented.
Supported Environments: Azure Monitor is tailored for monitoring Azure cloud services and resources, offering native support for Azure-specific metrics and integrations, while Cacti is more suitable for monitoring traditional on-premises network infrastructure and may require additional customization to monitor cloud-based environments effectively.

Azure Monitor vs Cacti

Overview