StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Azure Monitor vs Sensu

Azure Monitor vs Sensu

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sensu
Sensu
Stacks201
Followers251
Votes56
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks386
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
Stacks61
Followers184
Votes0

Azure Monitor vs Sensu: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Monitor and Sensu are both monitoring solutions that help organizations ensure the availability, performance, and reliability of their applications and infrastructure. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Scalability and Integration Abilities: Azure Monitor is a fully integrated monitoring service provided by Microsoft Azure, which makes it easy to monitor resources across Azure, on-premises, and other cloud environments. On the other hand, Sensu is a highly scalable open-source monitoring solution that can be integrated with various tools and platforms, giving users more flexibility when it comes to monitoring their infrastructure.

  2. Pricing Model: Azure Monitor follows a pricing model that is based on the amount of data ingested and the number of monitoring features used. This makes it convenient for users who want a pay-as-you-go approach. In contrast, Sensu offers a subscription-based pricing model, providing users with more predictable costs for their monitoring needs.

  3. Alerting and Notification: Azure Monitor provides built-in alerting capabilities that can integrate with various notification channels, such as email, SMS, and Azure Logic Apps. It also supports custom alerting based on user-defined metrics, logs, and events. Sensu, on the other hand, relies on external tools for alerting and notification, giving users the flexibility to choose their preferred notification channels and third-party integrations.

  4. Monitoring Capabilities: Azure Monitor offers a wide range of monitoring capabilities, including metrics monitoring, log analytics, application insights, and network monitoring. It provides a comprehensive view of the health and performance of the infrastructure. Sensu focuses primarily on infrastructure monitoring and offers extensibility through plugins, enabling users to monitor specific aspects of their environment.

  5. Ease of Use: Azure Monitor provides a user-friendly interface and integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, making it convenient for users already utilizing the Azure ecosystem. Sensu, being an open-source solution, requires some technical expertise for setup and configuration, but provides users with more control and customization options.

  6. Support and Documentation: Azure Monitor benefits from Microsoft's extensive support and documentation resources. It offers enterprise-grade support options and comprehensive documentation to assist users in troubleshooting and utilizing the service effectively. Sensu, being an open-source solution, relies on community support and documentation, which may not be as extensive or readily available as Azure Monitor.

**In Summary, Azure Monitor is a fully integrated monitoring service with scalable capabilities and deep integration with Azure services, while Sensu is an open-source solution that offers flexibility and extensibility in monitoring infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sensu
Sensu
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.

Health checks & custom metrics; alerts & incident management; real-time inventory; auto-remediation & custom workflows; container monitoring; Kubernetes monitoring; telemetry & service health checking; multi-cloud monitoring
Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
386
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
201
Stacks
61
Followers
251
Followers
184
Votes
56
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Support for almost anything
  • 11
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Message routing
  • 7
    Devs can code their own checks
  • 5
    Ease of use
Cons
  • 1
    Plugins
  • 1
    Written in Go
No community feedback yet
Integrations
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
Prometheus
Prometheus
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Grafana
Grafana
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Jira
Jira
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
BindPlane
BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Sensu, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana