StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs FortiAuthenticator

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs FortiAuthenticator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Stacks4
Followers12
Votes0
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication vs FortiAuthenticator: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and FortiAuthenticator are both authentication solutions that provide an additional layer of security to protect against unauthorized access. However, there are key differences between these two platforms.

  1. Integration with Cloud Services: Azure MFA is fully integrated with Microsoft Azure and offers seamless integration with other Azure cloud services, such as Azure Active Directory (AAD) and Azure AD Connect. On the other hand, FortiAuthenticator is a standalone product that can work alongside other Fortinet products, but does not have the same level of integration with cloud services.

  2. Deployment Options: Azure MFA is primarily a cloud-based solution that can be easily deployed and managed through the Azure portal. It offers scalability and flexibility, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, offers both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, allowing customers to choose the deployment method that best suits their needs and security requirements.

  3. Authentication Methods: Azure MFA supports a wide range of authentication methods, including phone call, text message, mobile app notification, and hardware tokens. It also offers the option to define custom authentication methods. FortiAuthenticator also supports a variety of authentication methods, including SMS, email, mobile app, and hardware tokens. However, it does not have the same level of flexibility when it comes to custom authentication methods.

  4. Identity Providers: Azure MFA is tightly integrated with Azure Active Directory and supports federated authentication using popular identity providers such as Okta, PingFederate, and ADFS. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, supports a wide range of identity providers, including LDAP, RADIUS, and SAML, making it more suitable for organizations with diverse authentication requirements.

  5. Policy Management: Azure MFA provides a flexible policy management framework that allows administrators to define granular policies based on user groups, applications, and authentication methods. It also offers adaptive authentication capabilities, allowing for dynamic policy enforcement based on risk assessment. FortiAuthenticator also provides policy management capabilities, allowing administrators to define authentication policies based on user roles and access requirements.

  6. Reporting and Analytics: Azure MFA provides comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing administrators to monitor authentication events, user activity, and security breaches. It also integrates with Azure Monitor for proactive monitoring and alerting. FortiAuthenticator also offers reporting and analytics features, allowing administrators to track authentication events and user activity, but does not have the same level of integration with monitoring and alerting services.

In Summary, Azure MFA offers seamless integration with Azure cloud services, primarily caters to cloud-based deployments, and provides a wide range of authentication methods. FortiAuthenticator, on the other hand, offers flexible deployment options, supports a variety of identity providers, and provides policy management capabilities along with reporting and analytics features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication
FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator

It helps safeguard access to data and applications while maintaining simplicity for users. It provides additional security by requiring a second form of authentication and delivers strong authentication via a range of easy to use authentication methods. Users may or may not be challenged for MFA based on configuration decisions that an administrator makes.

It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

Mobile app as a second factor; Phone call as a second factor; SMS as a second factor; Admin control over verification methods
Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network; Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken; Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment; Guest management for wired and wireless network security; Single Sign On capabilities for both internal and cloud networks
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
4
Followers
12
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, FortiAuthenticator?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope