StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Backbone.js vs Marionette

Backbone.js vs Marionette

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Stacks7.5K
Followers3.5K
Votes675
GitHub Stars28.1K
Forks5.3K
Marionette
Marionette
Stacks169
Followers128
Votes80
GitHub Stars7.1K
Forks1.2K

Backbone.js vs Marionette: What are the differences?

Introduction

Backbone.js and Marionette are widely used JavaScript frameworks for building web applications. While both frameworks are popular and have similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Architecture: Backbone.js is a lightweight framework that focuses on providing a basic structure for web applications, whereas Marionette is an opinionated framework built on top of Backbone.js that offers a more advanced and organized architecture. Marionette provides a modular and extensible architecture with built-in features like event-driven programming, better view management, and enhanced application structure, which makes it easier to develop complex applications.

  2. View Management: Backbone.js provides a simple and lightweight view management system where views are responsible for rendering and updating the DOM elements. On the other hand, Marionette offers a more robust and powerful view management system. It introduces the concept of layouts, regions, and views that allow for better organization and management of views. Marionette also provides automated view rendering, template management, and nested views, making it easier to handle complex view hierarchies.

  3. Event Handling: In Backbone.js, event handling is done manually by binding and triggering events using the built-in event system. On the other hand, Marionette enhances event handling by providing a more convenient event management system. Marionette introduces a central event aggregator that allows for easy communication between different components of an application. It also provides better event delegation and bubbling mechanisms, making it easier to handle complex interaction scenarios.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Backbone.js has a larger community and a more mature ecosystem compared to Marionette. This means that there are more resources, libraries, and plugins available for Backbone.js. However, Marionette has a growing community and a focused set of features that cater specifically to building complex applications. The Marionette community is known for its active support and documentation, making it a good choice for developers looking for a curated and specialized framework.

  5. Development Philosophy: Backbone.js follows a minimalist philosophy and prioritizes simplicity and flexibility. It provides a lightweight and unopinionated framework that allows developers to make their own choices and decisions. Marionette, on the other hand, follows an opinionated philosophy and provides a set of conventions and best practices to follow. Marionette aims to provide a more structured and standardized development experience, which can be helpful for teams or developers who prefer a more guided approach.

  6. Learning Curve: While both Backbone.js and Marionette have a learning curve, Marionette may have a steeper learning curve due to its additional features and conventions. Backbone.js is relatively easier to learn and understand, making it a good choice for developers who want a lightweight and flexible framework without a steep learning curve. Marionette, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of Backbone.js and its conventions, making it more suitable for developers who want a more organized and opinionated framework.

In Summary, Backbone.js is a lightweight framework that provides a basic structure for web applications, while Marionette is an opinionated framework built on top of Backbone.js, offering a more advanced and organized architecture with enhanced view management, event handling, and a growing community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Marionette
Marionette

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

-
Layouts; Utilities; Behaviors; Radio; Objects
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.1K
GitHub Stars
7.1K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
7.5K
Stacks
169
Followers
3.5K
Followers
128
Votes
675
Votes
80
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Javascript structure
  • 101
    Models
  • 98
    Simple
  • 76
    Restful
  • 59
    Easy api
Cons
  • 1
    Requires underscore.js
Pros
  • 20
    Uses Backbone
  • 20
    MVC compliant
  • 13
    Views management
  • 9
    View management
  • 7
    JavaScript
Integrations
No integrations available
Meteor
Meteor
JavaScript
JavaScript
Algolia
Algolia

What are some alternatives to Backbone.js, Marionette?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

Chaplin

Chaplin

Chaplin addresses Backbone’s limitations by providing a lightweight and flexible structure that features well-proven design patterns and best practices. Chaplin empowers you to quickly develop scalable single-page web applications; allowing you to focus on designing and developing the underlying functionality in your web application.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase