Backendless vs Socket.IO

Overview

Backendless

Stacks16

Followers74

Votes0

Socket.IO

Stacks13.6K

Followers11.0K

Votes776

Backendless vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Architecture: Backendless provides a full-fledged backend-as-a-service platform that includes a database, user authentication, push notifications, and more, making it a comprehensive solution for building applications. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a real-time engine that enables bidirectional event-based communication between clients and servers, focusing solely on real-time functionality.
Programming Language Support: Backendless supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, Java, and Swift, providing flexibility for developers to work with their preferred language. In contrast, Socket.IO is primarily based on JavaScript and is specifically designed for working with Node.js, limiting the language options available for developers.
Hosting: Backendless offers hosting for backend services, providing a seamless deployment process for applications built using its platform. Socket.IO, on the other hand, requires developers to set up their own server infrastructure, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Real-time Functionality: While Backendless does support real-time features through its API services, it is not as specialized in real-time communication as Socket.IO, which is specifically designed for handling real-time events and data synchronization between clients and servers.
Community and Support: Backendless has a robust community and extensive documentation to support developers in building applications, along with customer support for troubleshooting issues. Socket.IO also has a strong community but may not have as extensive documentation and support resources as Backendless.
Scalability: Backendless provides scalability features such as automatic scaling and load balancing to handle growing application demands efficiently. Socket.IO, being a real-time engine, requires developers to implement their own scalability solutions, which may be more challenging for those without expertise in managing scalable infrastructures.

In Summary, Backendless is a comprehensive backend-as-a-service platform with multiple language support and hosting options, while Socket.IO is a specialized real-time engine focused on bidirectional communication between clients and servers, requiring developers to manage their own server infrastructure and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Backendless, Socket.IO

Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

ExpressJS

React

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M

Comments

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Backendless	Socket.IO
It is a development and runtime platform which simplifies and shortens mobile application development process. The platform removes the need to develop backend functionality by providing reusable server-side services via APIs. The APIs are packaged into native libraries available for all major client-side environments - Andoid, iOS, JavaScript, .NET, ActionScript and REST. The default backend logic can be modified with custom server-side code. The platform is available as an online service and a downloadable Enterprise product which can be deployed in any environment.	It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.
Provides intuitive APIs for handling user registration, login and session management; Supports object persistence with complex hierarchies; Delivers push notifications to iOS, Android and Windows Phone devices; Handles publish subscribe message routing; Performs ultra fast geo queries; Generates client-side code to get developers to start coding faster; Backend logic can be modified with custom code; Includes in-depth analytics; Allows to export and import data;	Real-time analytics - Push data to clients that gets represented as real-time counters, charts or logs.;Binary streaming - Starting in 1.0, it's possible to send any blob back and forth: image, audio, video.;Instant messaging and chat - Socket.IO's "Hello world" is a chat app in just a few lines of code.;Document collaboration - Allow users to concurrently edit a document and see each other's changes.
Statistics
Stacks 16	Stacks 13.6K
Followers 74	Followers 11.0K
Votes 0	Votes 776
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 219 Real-time 143 Node.js 141 Event-based communication 102 WebSockets 102 Open source Cons 12 Bad documentation 4 Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated 3 Doesn't work on React Native 2 Websocket Errors 2 Small community
Integrations
No integrations available	Auth0 Gatsby Flutter React Backbone.js Cloud Firestore Outbrain

What are some alternatives to Backendless, Socket.IO?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Backendless vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Architecture: Backendless provides a full-fledged backend-as-a-service platform that includes a database, user authentication, push notifications, and more, making it a comprehensive solution for building applications. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a real-time engine that enables bidirectional event-based communication between clients and servers, focusing solely on real-time functionality.
Programming Language Support: Backendless supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, Java, and Swift, providing flexibility for developers to work with their preferred language. In contrast, Socket.IO is primarily based on JavaScript and is specifically designed for working with Node.js, limiting the language options available for developers.
Hosting: Backendless offers hosting for backend services, providing a seamless deployment process for applications built using its platform. Socket.IO, on the other hand, requires developers to set up their own server infrastructure, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Real-time Functionality: While Backendless does support real-time features through its API services, it is not as specialized in real-time communication as Socket.IO, which is specifically designed for handling real-time events and data synchronization between clients and servers.
Community and Support: Backendless has a robust community and extensive documentation to support developers in building applications, along with customer support for troubleshooting issues. Socket.IO also has a strong community but may not have as extensive documentation and support resources as Backendless.
Scalability: Backendless provides scalability features such as automatic scaling and load balancing to handle growing application demands efficiently. Socket.IO, being a real-time engine, requires developers to implement their own scalability solutions, which may be more challenging for those without expertise in managing scalable infrastructures.

Backendless vs Socket.IO

Overview