StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Bazel vs Sonatype Nexus

Bazel vs Sonatype Nexus

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
Stacks526
Followers370
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks672
Bazel
Bazel
Stacks314
Followers579
Votes133

Bazel vs Sonatype Nexus: What are the differences?

# Bazel vs Sonatype Nexus

<Write introduction here>

1. **Build System vs Repository Manager**: Bazel is a build system that focuses on building software and managing dependencies, while Sonatype Nexus is a repository manager that stores, manages, and distributes binary components. While Bazel helps with the actual process of building software, Sonatype Nexus helps with storing and retrieving build artifacts.
2. **Language Support**: Bazel supports multiple languages including Java, C++, and Python, providing a more diverse range of supported languages for developers. On the other hand, Sonatype Nexus is language-agnostic and can be used with any programming language that requires dependency management and artifact storage.
3. **Scalability**: Bazel is known for its scalability, easily handling large codebases with millions of lines of code and dependencies. Sonatype Nexus, while capable of managing a considerable number of artifacts, may face challenges with extremely large-scale projects or organizations due to its focus on repository management.
4. **Dependency Management**: Bazel has built-in dependency management capabilities, allowing developers to define and manage dependencies within the build system. In contrast, Sonatype Nexus primarily focuses on storing and serving dependencies, relying on integration with build tools like Bazel for managing dependencies in the build process.
5. **Build Performance**: Bazel is renowned for its fast build times, utilizing its advanced caching and parallel execution features to optimize build performance. Sonatype Nexus, being a repository manager, does not directly impact build performance but can indirectly affect it if there are issues with artifact retrieval or network latency.
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Bazel has a thriving open-source community and ecosystem with active contributions and support from major tech companies. Sonatype Nexus also has a community around it, but its primary focus is on providing enterprise-level repository management solutions with less emphasis on building and compiling software.

In summary, Bazel and Sonatype Nexus differ in their core functionalities, language support, scalability, dependency management approaches, build performance, and community focus. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the software development and deployment lifecycle. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
Bazel
Bazel

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Supports ZIP;System information;Metrices;Logging and Log viewer
Multi-language support: Bazel supports Java, Objective-C and C++ out of the box, and can be extended to support arbitrary programming languages;High-level build language: Projects are described in the BUILD language, a concise text format that describes a project as sets of small interconnected libraries, binaries and tests. By contrast, with tools like Make you have to describe individual files and compiler invocations;Multi-platform support: The same tool and the same BUILD files can be used to build software for different architectures, and even different platforms. At Google, we use Bazel to build both server applications running on systems in our data centers and client apps running on mobile phones;Reproducibility: In BUILD files, each library, test, and binary must specify its direct dependencies completely. Bazel uses this dependency information to know what must be rebuilt when you make changes to a source file, and which tasks can run in parallel. This means that all builds are incremental and will always produce the same result;Scalable: Bazel can handle large builds
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
672
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
526
Stacks
314
Followers
370
Followers
579
Votes
0
Votes
133
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
Cons
  • 3
    No Windows Support
  • 2
    Bad IntelliJ support
  • 1
    Constant breaking changes
  • 1
    Lack of Documentation
  • 1
    Learning Curve
Integrations
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Swift
Swift
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to Sonatype Nexus, Bazel?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana