Bitbucket Pipelines vs Concourse

Overview

Concourse

Stacks254

Followers393

Votes54

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks870

Bitbucket Pipelines

Stacks350

Followers368

Votes0

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Concourse: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Concourse for DevOps processes.

Integration with version control systems: Bitbucket Pipelines are tightly integrated with Bitbucket repositories, allowing seamless integration and deployment processes within the repository itself. On the other hand, Concourse does not have native integration with any specific version control system, providing more flexibility in integrating with a variety of repositories.
Configuration process: Bitbucket Pipelines utilize a YAML configuration file for defining the pipeline steps, making it easy to set up and manage. In contrast, Concourse uses a declarative pipeline where users define the entire pipeline structure in code, offering more control over the configuration process.
Scaling capabilities: Bitbucket Pipelines are limited in scaling capabilities as they are primarily designed for smaller projects within the Bitbucket ecosystem. Concourse, on the other hand, offers better scalability options with its distributed architecture, making it suitable for large-scale projects with complex pipelines.
GUI vs CLI: Bitbucket Pipelines provide a user-friendly GUI for setting up and monitoring pipelines, making it easier for beginners to navigate. Concourse relies heavily on a command-line interface (CLI) for configuration and management, which may require more technical expertise to operate efficiently.
Community support and plugins: Bitbucket Pipelines have a strong community and extensive integration with Atlassian tools, providing a wide range of plugins and add-ons for enhanced functionality. Concourse, while lacking in native integrations, has a growing community that actively develops plugins to extend its capabilities and integrate with various tools and services.
Dependency management: Bitbucket Pipelines offer integrated dependency management within the Bitbucket ecosystem, simplifying the process of managing dependencies for builds and deployments. Concourse requires users to handle dependency management externally, providing more flexibility in choosing tools and processes for managing dependencies.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines focus on seamless integration with Bitbucket repositories and user-friendly GUI, while Concourse offers more flexibility in configuration, scalability, and dependency management for larger and complex projects in the DevOps space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Concourse, Bitbucket Pipelines

veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Concourse	Bitbucket Pipelines
Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.	It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.
-	Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 870	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 254	Stacks 350
Followers 393	Followers 368
Votes 54	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 16 Real pipelines 10 Containerised builds 9 Flexible engine 6 Fast 4 Open source Cons 2 Fail forward instead of rollback pattern	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Concourse, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Concourse: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Concourse for DevOps processes.

Integration with version control systems: Bitbucket Pipelines are tightly integrated with Bitbucket repositories, allowing seamless integration and deployment processes within the repository itself. On the other hand, Concourse does not have native integration with any specific version control system, providing more flexibility in integrating with a variety of repositories.
Configuration process: Bitbucket Pipelines utilize a YAML configuration file for defining the pipeline steps, making it easy to set up and manage. In contrast, Concourse uses a declarative pipeline where users define the entire pipeline structure in code, offering more control over the configuration process.
Scaling capabilities: Bitbucket Pipelines are limited in scaling capabilities as they are primarily designed for smaller projects within the Bitbucket ecosystem. Concourse, on the other hand, offers better scalability options with its distributed architecture, making it suitable for large-scale projects with complex pipelines.
GUI vs CLI: Bitbucket Pipelines provide a user-friendly GUI for setting up and monitoring pipelines, making it easier for beginners to navigate. Concourse relies heavily on a command-line interface (CLI) for configuration and management, which may require more technical expertise to operate efficiently.
Community support and plugins: Bitbucket Pipelines have a strong community and extensive integration with Atlassian tools, providing a wide range of plugins and add-ons for enhanced functionality. Concourse, while lacking in native integrations, has a growing community that actively develops plugins to extend its capabilities and integrate with various tools and services.
Dependency management: Bitbucket Pipelines offer integrated dependency management within the Bitbucket ecosystem, simplifying the process of managing dependencies for builds and deployments. Concourse requires users to handle dependency management externally, providing more flexibility in choosing tools and processes for managing dependencies.

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Concourse

Overview