Bitbucket Pipelines vs Visual Studio App Center

Overview

Bitbucket Pipelines

Stacks350

Followers368

Votes0

Visual Studio App Center

Stacks113

Followers232

Votes4

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Markdown code:

# Key Differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center

## Introduction

This article provides a comparison between Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center. It highlights the key differences between the two platforms in terms of their features and functionalities. Read on to understand which platform is best suited for your development and deployment needs.

## 1. **Integration with Version Control Systems**: Bitbucket Pipelines is specifically designed for projects hosted on Bitbucket, providing seamless integration with its version control system. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center supports integration with a variety of version control systems like Git, GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure Repos, offering developers more flexibility in choosing their preferred system.

## 2. **Supported Platforms**: Bitbucket Pipelines focuses primarily on supporting Linux-based environments. Although it is possible to build and deploy applications for other platforms, such as macOS and Windows, it may require additional configuration. In contrast, Visual Studio App Center supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Xamarin, and React Native, making it suitable for multi-platform development and testing.

## 3. **Build and Deployment Limits**: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a limited number of concurrent builds and deployments based on the user's plan. This means that if you exceed the limit, you may need to wait for a build or deployment slot to become available. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center provides higher limits or even unlimited concurrent builds and deployments, depending on the selected plan, enabling faster development and delivery processes.

## 4. **Testing and Distribution Capabilities**: Visual Studio App Center offers extensive testing capabilities, including automated UI testing, crash reporting, and analytics. It also provides features for distributing applications to testers and managing beta releases. Bitbucket Pipelines, on the other hand, has a more limited focus on continuous integration and delivery, without built-in support for testing and distribution functionalities.

## 5. **Third-party Integrations**: Both Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center offer integrations with commonly used third-party tools and services. However, Bitbucket Pipelines has a more limited selection of integrations compared to Visual Studio App Center. This can be a deciding factor for developers who heavily rely on specific tools for their development and deployment workflows.

## 6. **Pricing Structure**: Bitbucket Pipelines pricing is based on the number of users, whereas Visual Studio App Center pricing is based on the number of build minutes and device testing minutes. Depending on the size and requirements of your project, one pricing structure may be more cost-effective than the other.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center differ in terms of their integration with version control systems, supported platforms, build and deployment limits, testing and distribution capabilities, third-party integrations, and pricing structure. Choose the platform that aligns best with your development and deployment needs.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center differ in terms of their integration with version control systems, supported platforms, build and deployment limits, testing and distribution capabilities, third-party integrations, and pricing structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket Pipelines	Visual Studio App Center
It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.	Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;	Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks 350	Stacks 113
Followers 368	Followers 232
Votes 0	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Show error issues for mobile devices 1 Slack integration 1 For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking 1 Bug tracking integration
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Bitbucket Azure DevOps Slack

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket Pipelines, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

Markdown code:

# Key Differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center

## Introduction

This article provides a comparison between Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center. It highlights the key differences between the two platforms in terms of their features and functionalities. Read on to understand which platform is best suited for your development and deployment needs.

## 1. **Integration with Version Control Systems**: Bitbucket Pipelines is specifically designed for projects hosted on Bitbucket, providing seamless integration with its version control system. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center supports integration with a variety of version control systems like Git, GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure Repos, offering developers more flexibility in choosing their preferred system.

## 2. **Supported Platforms**: Bitbucket Pipelines focuses primarily on supporting Linux-based environments. Although it is possible to build and deploy applications for other platforms, such as macOS and Windows, it may require additional configuration. In contrast, Visual Studio App Center supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, macOS, Windows, Xamarin, and React Native, making it suitable for multi-platform development and testing.

## 3. **Build and Deployment Limits**: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a limited number of concurrent builds and deployments based on the user's plan. This means that if you exceed the limit, you may need to wait for a build or deployment slot to become available. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center provides higher limits or even unlimited concurrent builds and deployments, depending on the selected plan, enabling faster development and delivery processes.

## 4. **Testing and Distribution Capabilities**: Visual Studio App Center offers extensive testing capabilities, including automated UI testing, crash reporting, and analytics. It also provides features for distributing applications to testers and managing beta releases. Bitbucket Pipelines, on the other hand, has a more limited focus on continuous integration and delivery, without built-in support for testing and distribution functionalities.

## 5. **Third-party Integrations**: Both Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center offer integrations with commonly used third-party tools and services. However, Bitbucket Pipelines has a more limited selection of integrations compared to Visual Studio App Center. This can be a deciding factor for developers who heavily rely on specific tools for their development and deployment workflows.

## 6. **Pricing Structure**: Bitbucket Pipelines pricing is based on the number of users, whereas Visual Studio App Center pricing is based on the number of build minutes and device testing minutes. Depending on the size and requirements of your project, one pricing structure may be more cost-effective than the other.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines and Visual Studio App Center differ in terms of their integration with version control systems, supported platforms, build and deployment limits, testing and distribution capabilities, third-party integrations, and pricing structure. Choose the platform that aligns best with your development and deployment needs.

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Visual Studio App Center

Overview