StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Blade UI Kit vs Material-UI

Blade UI Kit vs Material-UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Blade UI Kit
Blade UI Kit
Stacks5
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks95

Blade UI Kit vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blade UI Kit and Material-UI are two popular UI frameworks used for designing websites. While both offer a range of features and functionality, there are some key differences between them that make each unique. This article will explore and highlight six of these key differences.

  1. Design Philosophy: Blade UI Kit follows a minimalist design philosophy, focusing on simplicity and elegance. It offers a sleek and modern look with flexible customization options. On the other hand, Material-UI is based on Google's Material Design principles, which prioritize the use of motion, material surfaces, and bold graphic elements to create a tangible and realistic user interface.

  2. Component Library: Blade UI Kit provides a comprehensive set of pre-designed components, including buttons, forms, cards, navigation bars, and more. These components are designed to be easily customizable and reusable, allowing developers to quickly build consistent and visually appealing interfaces. Material-UI also offers a wide range of components, but its component library is more extensive and includes advanced components like data grids, sliders, and date pickers.

  3. Styling and Theming: Blade UI Kit offers a flexible styling system that allows developers to easily customize the appearance of components using CSS classes or inline styles. It also provides a built-in theming system that allows for the creation of custom themes. Material-UI, on the other hand, uses JSS (JavaScript Style Sheet) as its styling solution. It provides a powerful theming system that allows for the dynamic customization of styles based on the application's theme.

  4. Integration with JavaScript Frameworks: Blade UI Kit is designed to work seamlessly with Blade, a server-side templating engine used in PHP frameworks like Laravel. It provides a set of Blade directives that simplify the integration of UI components into Blade templates. Material-UI, on the other hand, is built specifically for React.js. It offers a collection of React components that can be easily integrated into React applications, providing a consistent and efficient development experience.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: Blade UI Kit has a well-documented website with detailed guides, examples, and API references. It also has an active community that provides support through forums and social media channels. Material-UI has extensive documentation with clear and concise explanations, along with a vibrant online community that actively contributes to its growth. It also offers additional resources like tutorials, code samples, and a dedicated Slack channel for support.

  6. Popularity and Adoption: Blade UI Kit is gaining popularity, especially among the Laravel community, due to its seamless integration with the Laravel ecosystem. It is widely used in Laravel projects and has a growing user base. Material-UI, on the other hand, is one of the most popular UI frameworks for React.js. It has a large and active user community, extensive third-party tooling support, and is widely adopted by developers worldwide.

In summary, Blade UI Kit offers a minimalist design focused on simplicity and elegance, while Material-UI follows Google's Material Design principles with a focus on motion and bold graphic elements. Blade UI Kit integrates seamlessly with Blade and PHP frameworks, while Material-UI is specifically built for React.js. Blade UI Kit has a growing user base within the Laravel community, while Material-UI is widely adopted and popular among React developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Blade UI Kit
Blade UI Kit

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It is a set of renderless components to utilise in your Laravel Blade views. In all essence, it's a collection of useful utilities, connecting the dots between different parts of the TALL stack. It was made for Blade, Laravel's templating engine.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Countdown Timer; Wysiwyg; Mapbox
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
95
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
5
Followers
3.7K
Followers
13
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Blade UI Kit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase