StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Pure

Bootstrap vs Pure

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Pure
Pure
Stacks36
Followers120
Votes61

Bootstrap vs Pure: What are the differences?

  1. Grid System: One of the key differences between Bootstrap and Pure is their grid system. Bootstrap utilizes a 12-column grid system, allowing for flexible and responsive layouts. On the other hand, Pure adopts a more minimalistic approach with a 5-column grid system, which can be limiting in terms of design flexibility.

  2. Component Library: Bootstrap offers a vast collection of pre-built components such as navbars, cards, modals, and more. These components are ready to use and can be easily customized. In contrast, Pure provides a smaller set of basic components, focusing on simplicity and lightweight code. This means that Pure might require more custom development for advanced or specific features.

  3. Styling: Bootstrap comes with a predefined and consistent set of design styles, ensuring a cohesive look and feel across different elements. Additionally, Bootstrap offers a wide range of customizable themes and templates. Pure, on the other hand, provides minimal styling for a clean and neutral appearance, allowing designers more freedom to create their own unique styles.

  4. JavaScript Dependence: Bootstrap relies heavily on JavaScript for various interactive components and functionality, making it a powerful framework. Pure, in contrast, aims to be lightweight and does not rely on JavaScript for any of its core functionality. This can be advantageous for performance-focused projects or situations where JavaScript is not desired or available.

  5. Browser Support: Bootstrap has extensive browser support, including older versions of Internet Explorer. This makes it a suitable choice for projects that require compatibility with a wide range of browsers. Pure also has good browser support, but it may not support older browsers as comprehensively as Bootstrap does.

  6. Customization: Bootstrap provides a robust set of customization options, allowing developers to tailor the framework to their specific needs. This includes the ability to choose which components, styles, and JavaScript plugins to include, resulting in a more optimized and streamlined codebase. Pure, while offering some customization options, may be less flexible in comparison.

In summary, Bootstrap offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich framework with a larger component library, extensive customization options, and a powerful grid system, while Pure focuses on simplicity, lightweight code, and minimal styling, making it a suitable choice for more minimalist and performance-focused projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Pure

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Pure
Pure

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Pure is meant to be a starting point for every website or web app. We take care of all the CSS work that every site needs, without making it look cookie-cutter.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs;A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues;Consistently styled buttons that work with <a> and <button> elements;Styles for vertical and horizontal menus, including support for dropdown menus;Useful form alignments that look great on all screen sizes;Various common table styles;An extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize;Responsive by default, with a non-responsive option;Easy one-click customization with the Skin Builder;Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
36
Followers
13.2K
Followers
120
Votes
7.7K
Votes
61
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 14
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Simple
  • 10
    Responsive
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 4
    Pure

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Pure?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase