Brakeman vs Code Climate

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

Brakeman

Stacks164

Followers31

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.2K

Forks758

Brakeman vs Code Climate: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Integration with Development Tools - Code Climate provides seamless integration with major version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing easy access to code analysis results directly within the development environment. On the other hand, Brakeman, being a specialized security scanner for Ruby on Rails applications, does not offer direct integration with version control systems.
Key Difference 2: Focus on Security Vulnerabilities - Brakeman primarily focuses on security vulnerabilities specific to Ruby on Rails applications. It performs comprehensive static analysis to identify potential security vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and CSRF protection. Code Climate, on the other hand, provides a wider range of code analysis features beyond security, including code complexity, duplication, and test coverage metrics.
Key Difference 3: Customization and Extensibility - Code Climate offers a more customizable and extensible platform as compared to Brakeman. With Code Climate, developers can create their own custom rules and metrics using its flexible API, allowing them to tailor the analysis to fit their specific coding standards and requirements. Brakeman, being a specialized security scanner, has limited customization options.
Key Difference 4: Advanced Issue Tracking and Reporting - Code Climate provides advanced issue tracking and reporting capabilities, allowing developers to track code quality and security issues over time. It generates detailed reports and visualizations, highlighting trends and patterns in the codebase. Brakeman, on the other hand, focuses more on immediate issue detection rather than long-term tracking and reporting.
Key Difference 5: Community Support and Userbase - Code Climate has a larger userbase and a more active developer community compared to Brakeman. This results in frequent updates, bug fixes, and new features being added to Code Climate, ensuring better reliability and user support.
Key Difference 6: Pricing Model and Availability - Code Climate offers a freemium pricing model, allowing users to access basic code analysis features for free, with additional premium features available at a cost. Brakeman, being an open-source tool, is available for free and can be integrated into the development workflow without any additional cost.

In Summary, Brakeman is a specialized security scanner for Ruby on Rails applications, focusing primarily on security vulnerabilities, while Code Climate offers a wider range of code analysis features beyond security, along with advanced issue tracking, customization options, and a larger userbase.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	Brakeman
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	Free static analysis security tool for Ruby on Rails. Zero-setup security scans for Rails applications based on source code analysis.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 758
Stacks 740	Stacks 164
Followers 497	Followers 31
Votes 285	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, Brakeman?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

Brakeman vs Code Climate: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Integration with Development Tools - Code Climate provides seamless integration with major version control systems like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing easy access to code analysis results directly within the development environment. On the other hand, Brakeman, being a specialized security scanner for Ruby on Rails applications, does not offer direct integration with version control systems.
Key Difference 2: Focus on Security Vulnerabilities - Brakeman primarily focuses on security vulnerabilities specific to Ruby on Rails applications. It performs comprehensive static analysis to identify potential security vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and CSRF protection. Code Climate, on the other hand, provides a wider range of code analysis features beyond security, including code complexity, duplication, and test coverage metrics.
Key Difference 3: Customization and Extensibility - Code Climate offers a more customizable and extensible platform as compared to Brakeman. With Code Climate, developers can create their own custom rules and metrics using its flexible API, allowing them to tailor the analysis to fit their specific coding standards and requirements. Brakeman, being a specialized security scanner, has limited customization options.
Key Difference 4: Advanced Issue Tracking and Reporting - Code Climate provides advanced issue tracking and reporting capabilities, allowing developers to track code quality and security issues over time. It generates detailed reports and visualizations, highlighting trends and patterns in the codebase. Brakeman, on the other hand, focuses more on immediate issue detection rather than long-term tracking and reporting.
Key Difference 5: Community Support and Userbase - Code Climate has a larger userbase and a more active developer community compared to Brakeman. This results in frequent updates, bug fixes, and new features being added to Code Climate, ensuring better reliability and user support.
Key Difference 6: Pricing Model and Availability - Code Climate offers a freemium pricing model, allowing users to access basic code analysis features for free, with additional premium features available at a cost. Brakeman, being an open-source tool, is available for free and can be integrated into the development workflow without any additional cost.

Brakeman vs Code Climate

Overview