Browserling vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Browserling

Stacks12

Followers43

Votes0

Browserling vs Docker: What are the differences?

Infrastructure Type: Browserling is a web-based application that allows users to test their websites on different browsers, operating systems, and devices without the need for any installation. On the other hand, Docker is a platform that uses containerization technology to package and run applications with their dependencies in isolated environments.
Deployment Flexibility: Browserling requires an internet connection to access the service, making it suitable for testing websites on various setups. In contrast, Docker can be run on any system capable of running virtual machines, providing more deployment flexibility for a wide range of applications.
Resource Consumption: Browserling consumes resources from the server on which it is hosted, depending on the number of users accessing the service simultaneously. Docker, being a containerization platform, isolates applications and their dependencies, resulting in more efficient resource utilization.
Isolation: Browserling allows users to interact with different browser environments through a web interface but does not provide the same level of isolation as Docker containers. Docker offers full isolation for applications, preventing conflicts between different software versions or dependencies.
Customization: Browserling offers predefined browser configurations for testing purposes, limiting customization options for users. Docker, on the other hand, allows complete customization of the container environment, enabling users to tailor settings according to their specific requirements.
Scalability: Browserling is suitable for individual users or small teams looking to quickly test their websites on various browsers, making it less scalable for large-scale deployments. Docker, with its containerization technology, provides scalability by allowing users to deploy and manage multiple containers across different environments efficiently.

In Summary, Browserling is a web-based application for cross-browser testing, whereas Docker is a containerization platform for running applications in isolated environments with more flexibility and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Browserling

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Browserling
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Reverse-proxy your localhost into browserling with our ssh tunnels!;Just copy and paste an ssh one-liner from the UI.
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 12
Followers 143.8K	Followers 43
Votes 3.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, Browserling?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

Browserling vs Docker: What are the differences?

Infrastructure Type: Browserling is a web-based application that allows users to test their websites on different browsers, operating systems, and devices without the need for any installation. On the other hand, Docker is a platform that uses containerization technology to package and run applications with their dependencies in isolated environments.
Deployment Flexibility: Browserling requires an internet connection to access the service, making it suitable for testing websites on various setups. In contrast, Docker can be run on any system capable of running virtual machines, providing more deployment flexibility for a wide range of applications.
Resource Consumption: Browserling consumes resources from the server on which it is hosted, depending on the number of users accessing the service simultaneously. Docker, being a containerization platform, isolates applications and their dependencies, resulting in more efficient resource utilization.
Isolation: Browserling allows users to interact with different browser environments through a web interface but does not provide the same level of isolation as Docker containers. Docker offers full isolation for applications, preventing conflicts between different software versions or dependencies.
Customization: Browserling offers predefined browser configurations for testing purposes, limiting customization options for users. Docker, on the other hand, allows complete customization of the container environment, enabling users to tailor settings according to their specific requirements.
Scalability: Browserling is suitable for individual users or small teams looking to quickly test their websites on various browsers, making it less scalable for large-scale deployments. Docker, with its containerization technology, provides scalability by allowing users to deploy and manage multiple containers across different environments efficiently.

Browserling vs Docker

Overview