Browserling vs Rainforest QA: What are the differences?
What is Browserling? Interactive cross-browser testing. We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by
What is Rainforest QA? Front-end QA as a service. Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.
Browserling and Rainforest QA can be primarily classified as "Browser Testing" tools.
What is Browserling?
What is Rainforest QA?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Browserling?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Browserling?
What are the cons of using Rainforest QA?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Browserling?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
As a PM with a fair amount of testing experience I've been using Rainforest QA to build up a functional test suite for our web app. Writing tests is straightforward and it's nice to then get real humans executing the tests so that you can get readable feedback when something isn't working. I'd certainly recommend giving it a try to see if it might fit your workflow.