Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Buildbot

76
128
+ 1
27
Gitea

301
447
+ 1
123
Add tool

Buildbot vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

Buildbot and Gitea are popular tools used in software development processes. While they both serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare the main differences between Buildbot and Gitea.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: Buildbot primarily focuses on continuous integration and automation, providing support for different version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. On the other hand, Gitea is a lightweight and self-hosted Git service that offers full-fledged repository management capabilities.

  2. User Interface and Ease of Use: Gitea provides a streamlined and user-friendly web interface for managing repositories, issues, and collaboration features. It offers an intuitive experience for both developers and non-technical users. Buildbot, however, focuses more on automation and doesn't provide extensive user interface features for repository management.

  3. Deployment and Scalability: Buildbot is designed to be easily scalable, allowing the setup of distributed build systems with multiple builders, workers, and schedulers. Gitea, on the other hand, is primarily focused on managing individual repositories and doesn't provide robust options for distributed build systems.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Gitea has a thriving community with a wide range of plugins and integrations available. It benefits from the larger Git ecosystem and has extensive documentation and community support. Buildbot, although it has an active community, may have a relatively smaller ecosystem in comparison.

  5. Extensibility and customization: Buildbot offers extensive flexibility for customization and integration with third-party tools through its powerful build configuration system. Users can define complex build pipelines and workflows tailored to their specific requirements. Gitea, while it provides some extensibility options, focuses more on providing a unified user experience for Git repository management.

  6. Build and Test Automation: Buildbot specializes in build and test automation, providing features like continuous integration, distributed builds, and build status monitoring. While Gitea has basic features for build automation, it is not its primary focus, and it may be lacking in some of the advanced automation capabilities provided by Buildbot.

In summary, Buildbot and Gitea have key differences in terms of their integration with version control systems, user interface and ease of use, deployment and scalability, community and ecosystem, extensibility and customization, and focus on build automation. These factors should be considered based on specific requirements and preferences when choosing between the two tools.

Decisions about Buildbot and Gitea
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 720.9K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Buildbot
Pros of Gitea
  • 9
    Highly configurable builds
  • 5
    Hosted internally
  • 5
    Beautiful waterfall
  • 4
    Free open source
  • 3
    Python
  • 1
    No external web fonts by default
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
  • 9
    Multiple code maintainers
  • 6
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 5
    Squash and Merge is supported
  • 5
    Written in Go
  • 5
    Import existing git repositories
  • 4
    Nice gui
  • 3
    Run in Raspberry Pi
  • 2
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 2
    LDAP Support
  • 1
    𖣠⚪𔗢⚪🞋⚪𔗢⚪𖣠
  • 1
    Gitea Actions(Github compatible)
  • 1
     ‌𖣠⚪𔗢⚪🞋⚪𔗢⚪𖣠‌‌‌‌ 
  • 1
    Richable Packages
  • 1
    𖣠⚪𔗢⚪🞋⚪𔗢⚪𖣠
  • 1
     𖣠⚪𔗢⚪🞋⚪𔗢⚪𖣠‌‌‌ 
  • 0
    𖣠⚪𔗢⚪🞋⚪𔗢⚪𖣠

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Buildbot
Cons of Gitea
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Community-fork of Gogs
    • 0
      Easy Windows authentication is not supported

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    17
    55
    317
    500
    11K
    180

    What is Buildbot?

    BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle required by most software projects to validate code changes. By automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other developers are inconvenienced by the failure.

    What is Gitea?

    Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Buildbot?
    What companies use Gitea?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Buildbot?
    What tools integrate with Gitea?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Buildbot and Gitea?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    TeamCity
    TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
    GitLab CI
    GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    See all alternatives