Camunda vs OTRS: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Camunda is a versatile open-source workflow and decision automation platform that offers extensive integration capabilities with various systems, databases, and applications, allowing for seamless communication and data exchange. On the other hand, OTRS is primarily a ticketing system focused on IT service management, lacking the extensive integration features that Camunda offers.
  
2. **Workflow Orchestration vs Ticket Management**: Camunda is designed for workflow orchestration and decision automation, enabling complex process modeling and execution, while OTRS is more focused on ticket management and incident resolution in the IT service management domain. This fundamental difference dictates the primary use case and functionality of each platform.

3. **Flexibility and Customization**: Camunda provides a high level of flexibility and customization options, allowing users to tailor workflows, decision logic, and user interfaces to specific business requirements. In contrast, OTRS, while configurable to some extent, is more rigid in terms of customization and may not offer the same level of flexibility as Camunda.

4. **License Model**: Camunda follows an open-source licensing model, making its core features available for free and providing the source code for further customization and development. On the other hand, OTRS offers both open-source and commercial versions, with some advanced features and support services restricted to the commercial license, leading to cost implications for users.

5. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: Camunda enjoys a thriving community of developers, contributors, and users, resulting in a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and resources to enhance the platform's capabilities. While OTRS also has a community around it, the support and resources available may not be as extensive as those for Camunda.

6. **Scalability and Performance**: Camunda is known for its scalability and performance, capable of handling large volumes of process instances and complex workflows efficiently. OTRS, while suitable for managing ticketing tasks within an organization, may face limitations in scalability and performance when dealing with extensive process automation and high transaction volumes.

In Summary, Camunda and OTRS differ significantly in terms of integration capabilities, primary focus (workflow orchestration vs ticket management), flexibility, customization options, licensing model, community support, and scalability/performance.